1 | //! Abstraction for creating `fn` pointers from any callable that *effectively* |
2 | //! has the equivalent of implementing `Default`, even if the compiler neither |
3 | //! provides `Default` nor allows reifying closures (i.e. creating `fn` pointers) |
4 | //! other than those with absolutely no captures. |
5 | //! |
6 | //! More specifically, for a closure-like type to be "effectively `Default`": |
7 | //! * it must be a ZST (zero-sized type): no information contained within, so |
8 | //! that `Default`'s return value (if it were implemented) is unambiguous |
9 | //! * it must be `Copy`: no captured "unique ZST tokens" or any other similar |
10 | //! types that would make duplicating values at will unsound |
11 | //! * combined with the ZST requirement, this confers a kind of "telecopy" |
12 | //! ability: similar to `Copy`, but without keeping the value around, and |
13 | //! instead "reconstructing" it (a noop given it's a ZST) when needed |
14 | //! * it must be *provably* inhabited: no captured uninhabited types or any |
15 | //! other types that cannot be constructed by the user of this abstraction |
16 | //! * the proof is a value of the closure-like type itself, in a sense the |
17 | //! "seed" for the "telecopy" process made possible by ZST + `Copy` |
18 | //! * this requirement is the only reason an abstraction limited to a specific |
19 | //! usecase is required: ZST + `Copy` can be checked with *at worst* a panic |
20 | //! at the "attempted `::default()` call" time, but that doesn't guarantee |
21 | //! that the value can be soundly created, and attempting to use the typical |
22 | //! "proof ZST token" approach leads yet again to having a ZST + `Copy` type |
23 | //! that is not proof of anything without a value (i.e. isomorphic to a |
24 | //! newtype of the type it's trying to prove the inhabitation of) |
25 | //! |
26 | //! A more flexible (and safer) solution to the general problem could exist once |
27 | //! `const`-generic parameters can have type parameters in their types: |
28 | //! |
29 | //! ```rust,ignore (needs future const-generics) |
30 | //! extern "C" fn ffi_wrapper< |
31 | //! A, R, |
32 | //! F: Fn(A) -> R, |
33 | //! const f: F, // <-- this `const`-generic is not yet allowed |
34 | //! >(arg: A) -> R { |
35 | //! f(arg) |
36 | //! } |
37 | //! ``` |
38 | |
39 | use std::mem; |
40 | |
41 | // FIXME(eddyb) this could be `trait` impls except for the `const fn` requirement. |
42 | macro_rules! define_reify_functions { |
43 | ($( |
44 | fn $name:ident $(<$($param:ident),*>)? |
45 | for $(extern $abi:tt)? fn($($arg:ident: $arg_ty:ty),*) -> $ret_ty:ty; |
46 | )+) => { |
47 | $(pub const fn $name< |
48 | $($($param,)*)? |
49 | F: Fn($($arg_ty),*) -> $ret_ty + Copy |
50 | >(f: F) -> $(extern $abi)? fn($($arg_ty),*) -> $ret_ty { |
51 | // FIXME(eddyb) describe the `F` type (e.g. via `type_name::<F>`) once panic |
52 | // formatting becomes possible in `const fn`. |
53 | assert!(mem::size_of::<F>() == 0, "selfless_reify: closure must be zero-sized" ); |
54 | |
55 | $(extern $abi)? fn wrapper< |
56 | $($($param,)*)? |
57 | F: Fn($($arg_ty),*) -> $ret_ty + Copy |
58 | >($($arg: $arg_ty),*) -> $ret_ty { |
59 | let f = unsafe { |
60 | // SAFETY: `F` satisfies all criteria for "out of thin air" |
61 | // reconstructability (see module-level doc comment). |
62 | mem::MaybeUninit::<F>::uninit().assume_init() |
63 | }; |
64 | f($($arg),*) |
65 | } |
66 | let _f_proof = f; |
67 | wrapper::< |
68 | $($($param,)*)? |
69 | F |
70 | > |
71 | })+ |
72 | } |
73 | } |
74 | |
75 | define_reify_functions! { |
76 | fn _reify_to_extern_c_fn_unary<A, R> for extern "C" fn(arg: A) -> R; |
77 | |
78 | // HACK(eddyb) this abstraction is used with `for<'a> fn(BridgeConfig<'a>) |
79 | // -> T` but that doesn't work with just `reify_to_extern_c_fn_unary` |
80 | // because of the `fn` pointer type being "higher-ranked" (i.e. the |
81 | // `for<'a>` binder). |
82 | // FIXME(eddyb) try to remove the lifetime from `BridgeConfig`, that'd help. |
83 | fn reify_to_extern_c_fn_hrt_bridge<R> for extern "C" fn(bridge: super::BridgeConfig<'_>) -> R; |
84 | } |
85 | |