| 1 | // Note: these functions happen to produce the correct `usize::leading_zeros(0)` value |
| 2 | // without a explicit zero check. Zero is probably common enough that it could warrant |
| 3 | // adding a zero check at the beginning, but `__clzsi2` has a precondition that `x != 0`. |
| 4 | // Compilers will insert the check for zero in cases where it is needed. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | #[cfg (feature = "public-test-deps" )] |
| 7 | pub use implementation::{leading_zeros_default, leading_zeros_riscv}; |
| 8 | #[cfg (not(feature = "public-test-deps" ))] |
| 9 | pub(crate) use implementation::{leading_zeros_default, leading_zeros_riscv}; |
| 10 | |
| 11 | mod implementation { |
| 12 | use crate::int::{CastInto, Int}; |
| 13 | |
| 14 | /// Returns the number of leading binary zeros in `x`. |
| 15 | #[allow (dead_code)] |
| 16 | pub fn leading_zeros_default<T: Int + CastInto<usize>>(x: T) -> usize { |
| 17 | // The basic idea is to test if the higher bits of `x` are zero and bisect the number |
| 18 | // of leading zeros. It is possible for all branches of the bisection to use the same |
| 19 | // code path by conditionally shifting the higher parts down to let the next bisection |
| 20 | // step work on the higher or lower parts of `x`. Instead of starting with `z == 0` |
| 21 | // and adding to the number of zeros, it is slightly faster to start with |
| 22 | // `z == usize::MAX.count_ones()` and subtract from the potential number of zeros, |
| 23 | // because it simplifies the final bisection step. |
| 24 | let mut x = x; |
| 25 | // the number of potential leading zeros |
| 26 | let mut z = T::BITS as usize; |
| 27 | // a temporary |
| 28 | let mut t: T; |
| 29 | |
| 30 | const { assert!(T::BITS <= 64) }; |
| 31 | if T::BITS >= 64 { |
| 32 | t = x >> 32; |
| 33 | if t != T::ZERO { |
| 34 | z -= 32; |
| 35 | x = t; |
| 36 | } |
| 37 | } |
| 38 | if T::BITS >= 32 { |
| 39 | t = x >> 16; |
| 40 | if t != T::ZERO { |
| 41 | z -= 16; |
| 42 | x = t; |
| 43 | } |
| 44 | } |
| 45 | const { assert!(T::BITS >= 16) }; |
| 46 | t = x >> 8; |
| 47 | if t != T::ZERO { |
| 48 | z -= 8; |
| 49 | x = t; |
| 50 | } |
| 51 | t = x >> 4; |
| 52 | if t != T::ZERO { |
| 53 | z -= 4; |
| 54 | x = t; |
| 55 | } |
| 56 | t = x >> 2; |
| 57 | if t != T::ZERO { |
| 58 | z -= 2; |
| 59 | x = t; |
| 60 | } |
| 61 | // the last two bisections are combined into one conditional |
| 62 | t = x >> 1; |
| 63 | if t != T::ZERO { |
| 64 | z - 2 |
| 65 | } else { |
| 66 | z - x.cast() |
| 67 | } |
| 68 | |
| 69 | // We could potentially save a few cycles by using the LUT trick from |
| 70 | // "https://embeddedgurus.com/state-space/2014/09/ |
| 71 | // fast-deterministic-and-portable-counting-leading-zeros/". |
| 72 | // However, 256 bytes for a LUT is too large for embedded use cases. We could remove |
| 73 | // the last 3 bisections and use this 16 byte LUT for the rest of the work: |
| 74 | //const LUT: [u8; 16] = [0, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4]; |
| 75 | //z -= LUT[x] as usize; |
| 76 | //z |
| 77 | // However, it ends up generating about the same number of instructions. When benchmarked |
| 78 | // on x86_64, it is slightly faster to use the LUT, but this is probably because of OOO |
| 79 | // execution effects. Changing to using a LUT and branching is risky for smaller cores. |
| 80 | } |
| 81 | |
| 82 | // The above method does not compile well on RISC-V (because of the lack of predicated |
| 83 | // instructions), producing code with many branches or using an excessively long |
| 84 | // branchless solution. This method takes advantage of the set-if-less-than instruction on |
| 85 | // RISC-V that allows `(x >= power-of-two) as usize` to be branchless. |
| 86 | |
| 87 | /// Returns the number of leading binary zeros in `x`. |
| 88 | #[allow (dead_code)] |
| 89 | pub fn leading_zeros_riscv<T: Int + CastInto<usize>>(x: T) -> usize { |
| 90 | let mut x = x; |
| 91 | // the number of potential leading zeros |
| 92 | let mut z = T::BITS; |
| 93 | // a temporary |
| 94 | let mut t: u32; |
| 95 | |
| 96 | // RISC-V does not have a set-if-greater-than-or-equal instruction and |
| 97 | // `(x >= power-of-two) as usize` will get compiled into two instructions, but this is |
| 98 | // still the most optimal method. A conditional set can only be turned into a single |
| 99 | // immediate instruction if `x` is compared with an immediate `imm` (that can fit into |
| 100 | // 12 bits) like `x < imm` but not `imm < x` (because the immediate is always on the |
| 101 | // right). If we try to save an instruction by using `x < imm` for each bisection, we |
| 102 | // have to shift `x` left and compare with powers of two approaching `usize::MAX + 1`, |
| 103 | // but the immediate will never fit into 12 bits and never save an instruction. |
| 104 | const { assert!(T::BITS <= 64) }; |
| 105 | if T::BITS >= 64 { |
| 106 | // If the upper 32 bits of `x` are not all 0, `t` is set to `1 << 5`, otherwise |
| 107 | // `t` is set to 0. |
| 108 | t = ((x >= (T::ONE << 32)) as u32) << 5; |
| 109 | // If `t` was set to `1 << 5`, then the upper 32 bits are shifted down for the |
| 110 | // next step to process. |
| 111 | x >>= t; |
| 112 | // If `t` was set to `1 << 5`, then we subtract 32 from the number of potential |
| 113 | // leading zeros |
| 114 | z -= t; |
| 115 | } |
| 116 | if T::BITS >= 32 { |
| 117 | t = ((x >= (T::ONE << 16)) as u32) << 4; |
| 118 | x >>= t; |
| 119 | z -= t; |
| 120 | } |
| 121 | const { assert!(T::BITS >= 16) }; |
| 122 | t = ((x >= (T::ONE << 8)) as u32) << 3; |
| 123 | x >>= t; |
| 124 | z -= t; |
| 125 | t = ((x >= (T::ONE << 4)) as u32) << 2; |
| 126 | x >>= t; |
| 127 | z -= t; |
| 128 | t = ((x >= (T::ONE << 2)) as u32) << 1; |
| 129 | x >>= t; |
| 130 | z -= t; |
| 131 | t = (x >= (T::ONE << 1)) as u32; |
| 132 | x >>= t; |
| 133 | z -= t; |
| 134 | // All bits except the LSB are guaranteed to be zero for this final bisection step. |
| 135 | // If `x != 0` then `x == 1` and subtracts one potential zero from `z`. |
| 136 | z as usize - x.cast() |
| 137 | } |
| 138 | } |
| 139 | |
| 140 | intrinsics! { |
| 141 | /// Returns the number of leading binary zeros in `x` |
| 142 | pub extern "C" fn __clzsi2(x: u32) -> usize { |
| 143 | if cfg!(any(target_arch = "riscv32" , target_arch = "riscv64" )) { |
| 144 | leading_zeros_riscv(x) |
| 145 | } else { |
| 146 | leading_zeros_default(x) |
| 147 | } |
| 148 | } |
| 149 | |
| 150 | /// Returns the number of leading binary zeros in `x` |
| 151 | pub extern "C" fn __clzdi2(x: u64) -> usize { |
| 152 | if cfg!(any(target_arch = "riscv32" , target_arch = "riscv64" )) { |
| 153 | leading_zeros_riscv(x) |
| 154 | } else { |
| 155 | leading_zeros_default(x) |
| 156 | } |
| 157 | } |
| 158 | |
| 159 | /// Returns the number of leading binary zeros in `x` |
| 160 | pub extern "C" fn __clzti2(x: u128) -> usize { |
| 161 | let hi = (x >> 64) as u64; |
| 162 | if hi == 0 { |
| 163 | 64 + __clzdi2(x as u64) |
| 164 | } else { |
| 165 | __clzdi2(hi) |
| 166 | } |
| 167 | } |
| 168 | } |
| 169 | |