| 1 | //! XWayland related protocols |
| 2 | |
| 3 | #![cfg_attr (rustfmt, rustfmt_skip)] |
| 4 | |
| 5 | #[cfg (feature = "staging" )] |
| 6 | pub mod shell { |
| 7 | //! This protocol adds a xwayland_surface role which allows an Xwayland |
| 8 | //! server to associate an X11 window to a wl_surface. |
| 9 | //! |
| 10 | //! Before this protocol, this would be done via the Xwayland server |
| 11 | //! providing the wl_surface's resource id via the a client message with |
| 12 | //! the WL_SURFACE_ID atom on the X window. |
| 13 | //! This was problematic as a race could occur if the wl_surface |
| 14 | //! associated with a WL_SURFACE_ID for a window was destroyed before the |
| 15 | //! client message was processed by the compositor and another surface |
| 16 | //! (or other object) had taken its id due to recycling. |
| 17 | //! |
| 18 | //! This protocol solves the problem by moving the X11 window to wl_surface |
| 19 | //! association step to the Wayland side, which means that the association |
| 20 | //! cannot happen out-of-sync with the resource lifetime of the wl_surface. |
| 21 | //! |
| 22 | //! This protocol avoids duplicating the race on the other side by adding a |
| 23 | //! non-zero monotonic serial number which is entirely unique that is set on |
| 24 | //! both the wl_surface (via. xwayland_surface_v1's set_serial method) and |
| 25 | //! the X11 window (via. the `WL_SURFACE_SERIAL` client message) that can be |
| 26 | //! used to associate them, and synchronize the two timelines. |
| 27 | //! |
| 28 | //! The key words "must", "must not", "required", "shall", "shall not", |
| 29 | //! "should", "should not", "recommended", "may", and "optional" in this |
| 30 | //! document are to be interpreted as described in IETF RFC 2119. |
| 31 | |
| 32 | #[allow (missing_docs)] |
| 33 | pub mod v1 { |
| 34 | wayland_protocol!( |
| 35 | "./protocols/staging/xwayland-shell/xwayland-shell-v1.xml" , |
| 36 | [] |
| 37 | ); |
| 38 | } |
| 39 | } |
| 40 | |
| 41 | #[cfg (feature = "unstable" )] |
| 42 | pub mod keyboard_grab { |
| 43 | //! Protocol for grabbing the keyboard from Xwayland |
| 44 | //! |
| 45 | //! This protocol is application-specific to meet the needs of the X11 |
| 46 | //! protocol through Xwayland. It provides a way for Xwayland to request |
| 47 | //! all keyboard events to be forwarded to a surface even when the |
| 48 | //! surface does not have keyboard focus. |
| 49 | //! |
| 50 | //! In the X11 protocol, a client may request an "active grab" on the |
| 51 | //! keyboard. On success, all key events are reported only to the |
| 52 | //! grabbing X11 client. For details, see XGrabKeyboard(3). |
| 53 | //! |
| 54 | //! The core Wayland protocol does not have a notion of an active |
| 55 | //! keyboard grab. When running in Xwayland, X11 applications may |
| 56 | //! acquire an active grab inside Xwayland but that cannot be translated |
| 57 | //! to the Wayland compositor who may set the input focus to some other |
| 58 | //! surface. In doing so, it breaks the X11 client assumption that all |
| 59 | //! key events are reported to the grabbing client. |
| 60 | //! |
| 61 | //! This protocol specifies a way for Xwayland to request all keyboard |
| 62 | //! be directed to the given surface. The protocol does not guarantee |
| 63 | //! that the compositor will honor this request and it does not |
| 64 | //! prescribe user interfaces on how to handle the respond. For example, |
| 65 | //! a compositor may inform the user that all key events are now |
| 66 | //! forwarded to the given client surface, or it may ask the user for |
| 67 | //! permission to do so. |
| 68 | //! |
| 69 | //! Compositors are required to restrict access to this application |
| 70 | //! specific protocol to Xwayland alone. |
| 71 | |
| 72 | /// Unstable version 1 |
| 73 | pub mod zv1 { |
| 74 | wayland_protocol!( |
| 75 | "./protocols/unstable/xwayland-keyboard-grab/xwayland-keyboard-grab-unstable-v1.xml" , |
| 76 | [] |
| 77 | ); |
| 78 | } |
| 79 | } |
| 80 | |