1 | // RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s android-comparison-in-temp-failure-retry %t |
2 | |
3 | #define TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(x) \ |
4 | ({ \ |
5 | typeof(x) __z; \ |
6 | do \ |
7 | __z = (x); \ |
8 | while (__z == -1); \ |
9 | __z; \ |
10 | }) |
11 | |
12 | int foo(void); |
13 | int bar(int a); |
14 | |
15 | void test(void) { |
16 | int i; |
17 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((i = foo())); |
18 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(foo()); |
19 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((foo())); |
20 | |
21 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(foo() == 1); |
22 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:28: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY [android-comparison-in-temp-failure-retry] |
23 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((foo() == 1)); |
24 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:29: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
25 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((int)(foo() == 1)); |
26 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:34: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
27 | |
28 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(bar(foo() == 1)); |
29 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((bar(foo() == 1))); |
30 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((bar(foo() == 1)) == 1); |
31 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:40: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
32 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(((bar(foo() == 1)) == 1)); |
33 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:41: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
34 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((int)((bar(foo() == 1)) == 1)); |
35 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:46: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
36 | |
37 | #define INDIRECT TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
38 | INDIRECT(foo()); |
39 | INDIRECT((foo() == 1)); |
40 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:19: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
41 | INDIRECT(bar(foo() == 1)); |
42 | INDIRECT((int)((bar(foo() == 1)) == 1)); |
43 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:36: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
44 | |
45 | #define TFR(x) TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(x) |
46 | TFR(foo()); |
47 | TFR((foo() == 1)); |
48 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:14: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
49 | TFR(bar(foo() == 1)); |
50 | TFR((int)((bar(foo() == 1)) == 1)); |
51 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:31: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
52 | |
53 | #define ADD_TFR(x) (1 + TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(x) + 1) |
54 | ADD_TFR(foo()); |
55 | ADD_TFR(foo() == 1); |
56 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:17: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
57 | |
58 | ADD_TFR(bar(foo() == 1)); |
59 | ADD_TFR((int)((bar(foo() == 1)) == 1)); |
60 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:35: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
61 | |
62 | #define ADDP_TFR(x) (1 + TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((x)) + 1) |
63 | ADDP_TFR(foo()); |
64 | ADDP_TFR((foo() == 1)); |
65 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:19: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
66 | |
67 | ADDP_TFR(bar(foo() == 1)); |
68 | ADDP_TFR((int)((bar(foo() == 1)) == 1)); |
69 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:36: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
70 | |
71 | #define MACRO TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(foo() == 1) |
72 | MACRO; |
73 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
74 | |
75 | // Be sure that being a macro arg doesn't mess with this. |
76 | #define ID(x) (x) |
77 | ID(ADDP_TFR(bar(foo() == 1))); |
78 | ID(ADDP_TFR(bar(foo() == 1) == 1)); |
79 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:31: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
80 | ID(MACRO); |
81 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:6: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
82 | |
83 | #define CMP(x) x == 1 |
84 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(CMP(foo())); |
85 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:22: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
86 | } |
87 | |
88 | // Be sure that it works inside of things like loops, if statements, etc. |
89 | void control_flow(void) { |
90 | do { |
91 | if (TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(foo())) { |
92 | } |
93 | |
94 | if (TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(foo() == 1)) { |
95 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:34: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
96 | } |
97 | |
98 | if (TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(bar(foo() == 1))) { |
99 | } |
100 | |
101 | if (TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(bar(foo() == 1) == 1)) { |
102 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:44: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
103 | } |
104 | } while (TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(foo() == 1)); |
105 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:37: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
106 | } |
107 | |
108 | void with_nondependent_variable_type(void) { |
109 | #undef TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
110 | #define TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(x) \ |
111 | ({ \ |
112 | long int __z; \ |
113 | do \ |
114 | __z = (x); \ |
115 | while (__z == -1); \ |
116 | __z; \ |
117 | }) |
118 | |
119 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((foo())); |
120 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((int)(foo() == 1)); |
121 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:34: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
122 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((bar(foo() == 1))); |
123 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((int)((bar(foo() == 1)) == 1)); |
124 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:46: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
125 | } |
126 | |
127 | // I can't find a case where TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY is implemented like this, but if |
128 | // we can cheaply support it, I don't see why not. |
129 | void obscured_temp_failure_retry(void) { |
130 | #undef TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
131 | #define IMPL(x) \ |
132 | ({ \ |
133 | typeof(x) __z; \ |
134 | do \ |
135 | __z = (x); \ |
136 | while (__z == -1); \ |
137 | __z; \ |
138 | }) |
139 | |
140 | #define IMPL2(x) IMPL(x) |
141 | #define TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY(x) IMPL2(x) |
142 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((foo())); |
143 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((int)(foo() == 1)); |
144 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:34: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
145 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((bar(foo() == 1))); |
146 | TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY((int)((bar(foo() == 1)) == 1)); |
147 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:46: warning: top-level comparison in TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY |
148 | } |
149 | |