| 1 | // RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c++17-or-later %s modernize-use-scoped-lock %t -- -- -isystem %clang_tidy_headers -fno-delayed-template-parsing |
| 2 | |
| 3 | #include <mutex> |
| 4 | |
| 5 | void Positive() { |
| 6 | std::mutex m; |
| 7 | { |
| 8 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l(m); |
| 9 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 10 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l(m); |
| 11 | } |
| 12 | |
| 13 | { |
| 14 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l(m, std::adopt_lock); |
| 15 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 16 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l(std::adopt_lock, m); |
| 17 | } |
| 18 | |
| 19 | { |
| 20 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m); |
| 21 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l2(m); |
| 22 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:5: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 23 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:33: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 24 | } |
| 25 | |
| 26 | { |
| 27 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m), l2(m); |
| 28 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 29 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:40: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 30 | } |
| 31 | |
| 32 | { |
| 33 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m), l2(m), l3(m); |
| 34 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l4(m); |
| 35 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:5: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 36 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:40: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 37 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-4]]:47: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 38 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-4]]:33: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 39 | } |
| 40 | |
| 41 | { |
| 42 | std::lock(l1&: m, l2&: m); |
| 43 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m, std::adopt_lock); |
| 44 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l2(m, std::adopt_lock); |
| 45 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:5: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 46 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:33: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 47 | int a = 0; |
| 48 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l3(m); |
| 49 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 50 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l3(m); |
| 51 | int b = 0; |
| 52 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l4(m, std::adopt_lock); |
| 53 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 54 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l4(std::adopt_lock, m); |
| 55 | } |
| 56 | } |
| 57 | |
| 58 | |
| 59 | std::mutex p_m1; |
| 60 | void PositiveShortFunction() { |
| 61 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l(p_m1); |
| 62 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 63 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l(p_m1); |
| 64 | } |
| 65 | |
| 66 | |
| 67 | void PositiveNested() { |
| 68 | std::mutex m1; |
| 69 | if (true) { |
| 70 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l(m1); |
| 71 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 72 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l(m1); |
| 73 | { |
| 74 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l2(m1); |
| 75 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:7: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 76 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l2(m1); |
| 77 | { |
| 78 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l3(m1); |
| 79 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l4(m1); |
| 80 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:9: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 81 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:37: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 82 | } |
| 83 | { |
| 84 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l2(m1); |
| 85 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:9: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 86 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l2(m1); |
| 87 | } |
| 88 | } |
| 89 | } |
| 90 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l(m1); |
| 91 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 92 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l(m1); |
| 93 | } |
| 94 | |
| 95 | |
| 96 | void PositiveInsideArg(std::mutex &m1, std::mutex &m2, std::mutex &m3) { |
| 97 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m1); |
| 98 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l2(m2); |
| 99 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:3: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 100 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:31: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 101 | int a = 0; |
| 102 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l3(m3); |
| 103 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 104 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l3(m3); |
| 105 | } |
| 106 | |
| 107 | |
| 108 | void PositiveInsideConditional() { |
| 109 | std::mutex m1; |
| 110 | if (true) { |
| 111 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m1); |
| 112 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 113 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l1(m1); |
| 114 | } else { |
| 115 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m1); |
| 116 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 117 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l1(m1); |
| 118 | } |
| 119 | |
| 120 | while (true) { |
| 121 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m1); |
| 122 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 123 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l1(m1); |
| 124 | } |
| 125 | |
| 126 | for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) { |
| 127 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m1); |
| 128 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 129 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l1(m1); |
| 130 | } |
| 131 | } |
| 132 | |
| 133 | void PositiveLambda() { |
| 134 | std::mutex m; |
| 135 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m); |
| 136 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 137 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l1(m); |
| 138 | auto lambda1 = [&]() { |
| 139 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m); |
| 140 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 141 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l1(m); |
| 142 | }; |
| 143 | |
| 144 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l3(m); |
| 145 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l4(m); |
| 146 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:3: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 147 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:31: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 148 | auto lamda2 = [&]() { |
| 149 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l3(m); |
| 150 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l4(m); |
| 151 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:5: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 152 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:33: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 153 | }; |
| 154 | |
| 155 | auto lamda3 = [&]() { |
| 156 | std::lock(l1&: m, l2&: m); |
| 157 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m, std::adopt_lock); |
| 158 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l2(m, std::adopt_lock); |
| 159 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:5: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 160 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:33: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 161 | int a = 0; |
| 162 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l3(m); |
| 163 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 164 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l3(m); |
| 165 | int b = 0; |
| 166 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l4(m, std::adopt_lock); |
| 167 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 168 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l4(std::adopt_lock, m); |
| 169 | }; |
| 170 | |
| 171 | auto lamda4 = [&]() { |
| 172 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m); |
| 173 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 174 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l1(m); |
| 175 | int a = 0; |
| 176 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l2(m); |
| 177 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 178 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l2(m); |
| 179 | }; |
| 180 | } |
| 181 | |
| 182 | template <typename T> |
| 183 | void PositiveTemplated() { |
| 184 | std::mutex m1, m2, m3; |
| 185 | { |
| 186 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l(m1); |
| 187 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 188 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l(m1); |
| 189 | } |
| 190 | |
| 191 | { |
| 192 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m1); |
| 193 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l2(m2); |
| 194 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:5: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 195 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:33: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 196 | } |
| 197 | |
| 198 | { |
| 199 | std::lock(l1&: m1, l2&: m2); |
| 200 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m1, std::adopt_lock); |
| 201 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l2(m2, std::adopt_lock); |
| 202 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:5: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 203 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:33: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 204 | int a = 0; |
| 205 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l3(m3); |
| 206 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 207 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l3(m3); |
| 208 | } |
| 209 | } |
| 210 | |
| 211 | |
| 212 | template <typename Mutex> |
| 213 | void PositiveTemplatedMutex() { |
| 214 | Mutex m1, m2, m3; |
| 215 | { |
| 216 | std::lock_guard<Mutex> l(m1); |
| 217 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 218 | } |
| 219 | |
| 220 | { |
| 221 | std::lock_guard<Mutex> l1(m1); |
| 222 | std::lock_guard<Mutex> l2(m2); |
| 223 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:5: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 224 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:28: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 225 | } |
| 226 | |
| 227 | { |
| 228 | std::lock(m1, m2); |
| 229 | std::lock_guard<Mutex> l1(m1, std::adopt_lock); |
| 230 | std::lock_guard<Mutex> l2(m2, std::adopt_lock); |
| 231 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:5: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 232 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:28: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 233 | int a = 0; |
| 234 | std::lock_guard<Mutex> l3(m3); |
| 235 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 236 | } |
| 237 | } |
| 238 | |
| 239 | |
| 240 | template <template <typename> typename Lock> |
| 241 | void NegativeTemplate() { |
| 242 | std::mutex m1, m2; |
| 243 | { |
| 244 | Lock<std::mutex> l(m1); |
| 245 | } |
| 246 | |
| 247 | { |
| 248 | Lock<std::mutex> l1(m1); |
| 249 | Lock<std::mutex> l2(m2); |
| 250 | } |
| 251 | } |
| 252 | |
| 253 | void instantiate() { |
| 254 | NegativeTemplate<std::lock_guard>(); |
| 255 | } |
| 256 | |
| 257 | |
| 258 | struct PositiveClass { |
| 259 | void Positive() { |
| 260 | { |
| 261 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l(m1); |
| 262 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:7: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 263 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l(m1); |
| 264 | } |
| 265 | |
| 266 | { |
| 267 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m1); |
| 268 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l2(m2); |
| 269 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:7: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 270 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:35: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 271 | } |
| 272 | |
| 273 | { |
| 274 | std::lock(l1&: m1, l2&: m2); |
| 275 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m1, std::adopt_lock); |
| 276 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l2(m2, std::adopt_lock); |
| 277 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:7: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 278 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:35: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 279 | int a = 0; |
| 280 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l3(m3); |
| 281 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:7: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 282 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l3(m3); |
| 283 | } |
| 284 | } |
| 285 | |
| 286 | std::mutex m1; |
| 287 | std::mutex m2; |
| 288 | std::mutex m3; |
| 289 | }; |
| 290 | |
| 291 | |
| 292 | template <typename T> |
| 293 | struct PositiveTemplatedClass { |
| 294 | void Positive() { |
| 295 | { |
| 296 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l(m1); |
| 297 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:7: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 298 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l(m1); |
| 299 | } |
| 300 | |
| 301 | { |
| 302 | std::lock(l1&: m1, l2&: m2); |
| 303 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m1, std::adopt_lock); |
| 304 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l2(m2, std::adopt_lock); |
| 305 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:7: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 306 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:35: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 307 | int a = 0; |
| 308 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l3(m3); |
| 309 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:7: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 310 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l3(m3); |
| 311 | } |
| 312 | } |
| 313 | |
| 314 | template <typename... Ts> |
| 315 | void TemplatedPositive() { |
| 316 | { |
| 317 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l(m1); |
| 318 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:7: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 319 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l(m1); |
| 320 | } |
| 321 | |
| 322 | { |
| 323 | std::lock(l1&: m1, l2&: m2); |
| 324 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m1, std::adopt_lock); |
| 325 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l2(m2, std::adopt_lock); |
| 326 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:7: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 327 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:35: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 328 | int a = 0; |
| 329 | std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l3(m3); |
| 330 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:7: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 331 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l3(m3); |
| 332 | } |
| 333 | } |
| 334 | |
| 335 | std::mutex m1; |
| 336 | std::mutex m2; |
| 337 | std::mutex m3; |
| 338 | }; |
| 339 | |
| 340 | |
| 341 | template <typename T> |
| 342 | using Lock = std::lock_guard<T>; |
| 343 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:14: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 344 | // CHECK-FIXES: using Lock = std::scoped_lock<T>; |
| 345 | |
| 346 | using LockM = std::lock_guard<std::mutex>; |
| 347 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:15: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 348 | // CHECK-FIXES: using LockM = std::scoped_lock<std::mutex>; |
| 349 | |
| 350 | typedef std::lock_guard<std::mutex> LockDef; |
| 351 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:9: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 352 | // CHECK-FIXES: typedef std::scoped_lock<std::mutex> LockDef; |
| 353 | |
| 354 | |
| 355 | void PositiveUsingDecl() { |
| 356 | using std::lock_guard; |
| 357 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:14: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 358 | // CHECK-FIXES: using std::scoped_lock; |
| 359 | |
| 360 | using LockMFun = std::lock_guard<std::mutex>; |
| 361 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:20: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 362 | // CHECK-FIXES: using LockMFun = std::scoped_lock<std::mutex>; |
| 363 | |
| 364 | typedef std::lock_guard<std::mutex> LockDefFun; |
| 365 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 366 | // CHECK-FIXES: typedef std::scoped_lock<std::mutex> LockDefFun; |
| 367 | } |
| 368 | |
| 369 | template <typename T> |
| 370 | void PositiveUsingDeclTemplate() { |
| 371 | using std::lock_guard; |
| 372 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:14: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 373 | // CHECK-FIXES: using std::scoped_lock; |
| 374 | |
| 375 | std::mutex m; |
| 376 | lock_guard<std::mutex> l(m); |
| 377 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 378 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l(m); |
| 379 | |
| 380 | using LockFunT = std::lock_guard<T>; |
| 381 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:20: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 382 | // CHECK-FIXES: using LockFunT = std::scoped_lock<T>; |
| 383 | |
| 384 | using LockMFunT = std::lock_guard<std::mutex>; |
| 385 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:21: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 386 | // CHECK-FIXES: using LockMFunT = std::scoped_lock<std::mutex>; |
| 387 | |
| 388 | typedef std::lock_guard<std::mutex> LockDefFunT; |
| 389 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 390 | // CHECK-FIXES: typedef std::scoped_lock<std::mutex> LockDefFunT; |
| 391 | } |
| 392 | |
| 393 | void PositiveInUsingTypedefs() { |
| 394 | std::mutex m; |
| 395 | |
| 396 | { |
| 397 | Lock<std::mutex> l(m); |
| 398 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 399 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l(m); |
| 400 | } |
| 401 | |
| 402 | { |
| 403 | LockM l(m); |
| 404 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 405 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l(m); |
| 406 | } |
| 407 | |
| 408 | { |
| 409 | LockDef l(m); |
| 410 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 411 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l(m); |
| 412 | } |
| 413 | |
| 414 | { |
| 415 | std::lock(l1&: m, l2&: m); |
| 416 | Lock<std::mutex> l1(m, std::adopt_lock); |
| 417 | LockM l2(m, std::adopt_lock); |
| 418 | LockDef l3(m), l4(m); |
| 419 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:5: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 420 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:11: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 421 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:13: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 422 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-4]]:20: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 423 | int a = 0; |
| 424 | LockDef l5(m); |
| 425 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 426 | // CHECK-FIXES: std::scoped_lock l5(m); |
| 427 | } |
| 428 | } |
| 429 | |
| 430 | template <typename Mutex> |
| 431 | void PositiveInUsingTypedefsTemplated() { |
| 432 | Mutex m; |
| 433 | |
| 434 | { |
| 435 | Lock<Mutex> l(m); |
| 436 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 437 | } |
| 438 | |
| 439 | { |
| 440 | std::lock(m, m); |
| 441 | Lock<Mutex> l1(m, std::adopt_lock); |
| 442 | LockM l2(m, std::adopt_lock); |
| 443 | LockDef l3(m), l4(m); |
| 444 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:5: warning: use single 'std::scoped_lock' instead of multiple 'std::lock_guard' |
| 445 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:11: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 446 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:13: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 447 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-4]]:20: note: additional 'std::lock_guard' declared here |
| 448 | int a = 0; |
| 449 | LockDef l5(m); |
| 450 | // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: use 'std::scoped_lock' instead of 'std::lock_guard' |
| 451 | } |
| 452 | } |
| 453 | |
| 454 | // Non-STD lock_guard. |
| 455 | template <typename Mutex> |
| 456 | struct lock_guard { |
| 457 | lock_guard(Mutex &m) { } |
| 458 | lock_guard(const lock_guard& ) = delete; |
| 459 | }; |
| 460 | |
| 461 | void NegativeNonStdLockGuard() { |
| 462 | std::mutex m; |
| 463 | { |
| 464 | lock_guard<std::mutex> l(m); |
| 465 | } |
| 466 | |
| 467 | { |
| 468 | lock_guard<std::mutex> l1(m); |
| 469 | lock_guard<std::mutex> l2(m); |
| 470 | } |
| 471 | } |
| 472 | |