1 | //===---- OverlappingReplacementsTest.cpp - clang-tidy --------------------===// |
2 | // |
3 | // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. |
4 | // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. |
5 | // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception |
6 | // |
7 | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
8 | |
9 | #include "ClangTidyTest.h" |
10 | #include "clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h" |
11 | #include "gtest/gtest.h" |
12 | |
13 | namespace clang { |
14 | namespace tidy { |
15 | namespace test { |
16 | namespace { |
17 | |
18 | const char BoundDecl[] = "decl" ; |
19 | const char BoundIf[] = "if" ; |
20 | |
21 | // We define a reduced set of very small checks that allow to test different |
22 | // overlapping situations (no overlapping, replacements partially overlap, etc), |
23 | // as well as different kinds of diagnostics (one check produces several errors, |
24 | // several replacement ranges in an error, etc). |
25 | class UseCharCheck : public ClangTidyCheck { |
26 | public: |
27 | UseCharCheck(StringRef CheckName, ClangTidyContext *Context) |
28 | : ClangTidyCheck(CheckName, Context) {} |
29 | void registerMatchers(ast_matchers::MatchFinder *Finder) override { |
30 | using namespace ast_matchers; |
31 | Finder->addMatcher(NodeMatch: varDecl(hasType(InnerMatcher: isInteger())).bind(ID: BoundDecl), Action: this); |
32 | } |
33 | void check(const ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) override { |
34 | auto *VD = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<VarDecl>(ID: BoundDecl); |
35 | diag(VD->getBeginLoc(), "use char" ) << FixItHint::CreateReplacement( |
36 | CharSourceRange::getTokenRange(VD->getBeginLoc(), VD->getBeginLoc()), |
37 | "char" ); |
38 | } |
39 | }; |
40 | |
41 | class IfFalseCheck : public ClangTidyCheck { |
42 | public: |
43 | IfFalseCheck(StringRef CheckName, ClangTidyContext *Context) |
44 | : ClangTidyCheck(CheckName, Context) {} |
45 | void registerMatchers(ast_matchers::MatchFinder *Finder) override { |
46 | using namespace ast_matchers; |
47 | Finder->addMatcher(NodeMatch: ifStmt().bind(ID: BoundIf), Action: this); |
48 | } |
49 | void check(const ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) override { |
50 | auto *If = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<IfStmt>(ID: BoundIf); |
51 | auto *Cond = If->getCond(); |
52 | SourceRange Range = Cond->getSourceRange(); |
53 | if (auto *D = If->getConditionVariable()) { |
54 | Range = SourceRange(D->getBeginLoc(), D->getEndLoc()); |
55 | } |
56 | diag(Loc: Range.getBegin(), Description: "the cake is a lie" ) << FixItHint::CreateReplacement( |
57 | RemoveRange: CharSourceRange::getTokenRange(R: Range), Code: "false" ); |
58 | } |
59 | }; |
60 | |
61 | class RefactorCheck : public ClangTidyCheck { |
62 | public: |
63 | RefactorCheck(StringRef CheckName, ClangTidyContext *Context) |
64 | : ClangTidyCheck(CheckName, Context), NamePattern("::$" ) {} |
65 | RefactorCheck(StringRef CheckName, ClangTidyContext *Context, |
66 | StringRef NamePattern) |
67 | : ClangTidyCheck(CheckName, Context), NamePattern(NamePattern) {} |
68 | virtual std::string newName(StringRef OldName) = 0; |
69 | |
70 | void registerMatchers(ast_matchers::MatchFinder *Finder) final { |
71 | using namespace ast_matchers; |
72 | Finder->addMatcher(NodeMatch: varDecl(matchesName(RegExp: NamePattern)).bind(ID: BoundDecl), Action: this); |
73 | } |
74 | |
75 | void check(const ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) final { |
76 | auto *VD = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<VarDecl>(ID: BoundDecl); |
77 | std::string NewName = newName(OldName: VD->getName()); |
78 | |
79 | auto Diag = diag(VD->getLocation(), "refactor %0 into %1" ) |
80 | << VD->getName() << NewName |
81 | << FixItHint::CreateReplacement( |
82 | CharSourceRange::getTokenRange(VD->getLocation(), |
83 | VD->getLocation()), |
84 | NewName); |
85 | |
86 | class UsageVisitor : public RecursiveASTVisitor<UsageVisitor> { |
87 | public: |
88 | UsageVisitor(const ValueDecl *VD, StringRef NewName, |
89 | DiagnosticBuilder &Diag) |
90 | : VD(VD), NewName(NewName), Diag(Diag) {} |
91 | bool VisitDeclRefExpr(DeclRefExpr *E) { |
92 | if (const ValueDecl *D = E->getDecl()) { |
93 | if (VD->getCanonicalDecl() == D->getCanonicalDecl()) { |
94 | Diag << FixItHint::CreateReplacement( |
95 | CharSourceRange::getTokenRange(E->getSourceRange()), NewName); |
96 | } |
97 | } |
98 | return RecursiveASTVisitor<UsageVisitor>::VisitDeclRefExpr(E); |
99 | } |
100 | |
101 | private: |
102 | const ValueDecl *VD; |
103 | StringRef NewName; |
104 | DiagnosticBuilder &Diag; |
105 | }; |
106 | |
107 | UsageVisitor(VD, NewName, Diag) |
108 | .TraverseDecl(Result.Context->getTranslationUnitDecl()); |
109 | } |
110 | |
111 | protected: |
112 | const std::string NamePattern; |
113 | }; |
114 | |
115 | class StartsWithPotaCheck : public RefactorCheck { |
116 | public: |
117 | StartsWithPotaCheck(StringRef CheckName, ClangTidyContext *Context) |
118 | : RefactorCheck(CheckName, Context, "::pota" ) {} |
119 | |
120 | std::string newName(StringRef OldName) override { |
121 | return "toma" + OldName.substr(Start: 4).str(); |
122 | } |
123 | }; |
124 | |
125 | class EndsWithTatoCheck : public RefactorCheck { |
126 | public: |
127 | EndsWithTatoCheck(StringRef CheckName, ClangTidyContext *Context) |
128 | : RefactorCheck(CheckName, Context, "tato$" ) {} |
129 | |
130 | std::string newName(StringRef OldName) override { |
131 | return OldName.substr(Start: 0, N: OldName.size() - 4).str() + "melo" ; |
132 | } |
133 | }; |
134 | |
135 | } // namespace |
136 | |
137 | TEST(OverlappingReplacementsTest, UseCharCheckTest) { |
138 | const char Code[] = |
139 | R"(void f() { |
140 | int a = 0; |
141 | if (int b = 0) { |
142 | int c = a; |
143 | } |
144 | })" ; |
145 | |
146 | const char CharFix[] = |
147 | R"(void f() { |
148 | char a = 0; |
149 | if (char b = 0) { |
150 | char c = a; |
151 | } |
152 | })" ; |
153 | EXPECT_EQ(CharFix, runCheckOnCode<UseCharCheck>(Code)); |
154 | } |
155 | |
156 | TEST(OverlappingReplacementsTest, IfFalseCheckTest) { |
157 | const char Code[] = |
158 | R"(void f() { |
159 | int potato = 0; |
160 | if (int b = 0) { |
161 | int c = potato; |
162 | } else if (true) { |
163 | int d = 0; |
164 | } |
165 | })" ; |
166 | |
167 | const char IfFix[] = |
168 | R"(void f() { |
169 | int potato = 0; |
170 | if (false) { |
171 | int c = potato; |
172 | } else if (false) { |
173 | int d = 0; |
174 | } |
175 | })" ; |
176 | EXPECT_EQ(IfFix, runCheckOnCode<IfFalseCheck>(Code)); |
177 | } |
178 | |
179 | TEST(OverlappingReplacementsTest, StartsWithCheckTest) { |
180 | const char Code[] = |
181 | R"(void f() { |
182 | int a = 0; |
183 | int potato = 0; |
184 | if (int b = 0) { |
185 | int c = potato; |
186 | } else if (true) { |
187 | int d = 0; |
188 | } |
189 | })" ; |
190 | |
191 | const char StartsFix[] = |
192 | R"(void f() { |
193 | int a = 0; |
194 | int tomato = 0; |
195 | if (int b = 0) { |
196 | int c = tomato; |
197 | } else if (true) { |
198 | int d = 0; |
199 | } |
200 | })" ; |
201 | EXPECT_EQ(StartsFix, runCheckOnCode<StartsWithPotaCheck>(Code)); |
202 | } |
203 | |
204 | TEST(OverlappingReplacementsTest, EndsWithCheckTest) { |
205 | const char Code[] = |
206 | R"(void f() { |
207 | int a = 0; |
208 | int potato = 0; |
209 | if (int b = 0) { |
210 | int c = potato; |
211 | } else if (true) { |
212 | int d = 0; |
213 | } |
214 | })" ; |
215 | |
216 | const char EndsFix[] = |
217 | R"(void f() { |
218 | int a = 0; |
219 | int pomelo = 0; |
220 | if (int b = 0) { |
221 | int c = pomelo; |
222 | } else if (true) { |
223 | int d = 0; |
224 | } |
225 | })" ; |
226 | EXPECT_EQ(EndsFix, runCheckOnCode<EndsWithTatoCheck>(Code)); |
227 | } |
228 | |
229 | TEST(OverlappingReplacementTest, ReplacementsDoNotOverlap) { |
230 | std::string Res; |
231 | const char Code[] = |
232 | R"(void f() { |
233 | int potassium = 0; |
234 | if (true) { |
235 | int Potato = potassium; |
236 | } |
237 | })" ; |
238 | |
239 | const char CharIfFix[] = |
240 | R"(void f() { |
241 | char potassium = 0; |
242 | if (false) { |
243 | char Potato = potassium; |
244 | } |
245 | })" ; |
246 | Res = runCheckOnCode<UseCharCheck, IfFalseCheck>(Code); |
247 | EXPECT_EQ(CharIfFix, Res); |
248 | |
249 | const char StartsEndsFix[] = |
250 | R"(void f() { |
251 | int tomassium = 0; |
252 | if (true) { |
253 | int Pomelo = tomassium; |
254 | } |
255 | })" ; |
256 | Res = runCheckOnCode<StartsWithPotaCheck, EndsWithTatoCheck>(Code); |
257 | EXPECT_EQ(StartsEndsFix, Res); |
258 | |
259 | const char CharIfStartsEndsFix[] = |
260 | R"(void f() { |
261 | char tomassium = 0; |
262 | if (false) { |
263 | char Pomelo = tomassium; |
264 | } |
265 | })" ; |
266 | Res = runCheckOnCode<UseCharCheck, IfFalseCheck, StartsWithPotaCheck, |
267 | EndsWithTatoCheck>(Code); |
268 | EXPECT_EQ(CharIfStartsEndsFix, Res); |
269 | } |
270 | |
271 | TEST(OverlappingReplacementsTest, ReplacementInsideOtherReplacement) { |
272 | std::string Res; |
273 | const char Code[] = |
274 | R"(void f() { |
275 | if (char potato = 0) { |
276 | } else if (int a = 0) { |
277 | char potato = 0; |
278 | if (potato) potato; |
279 | } |
280 | })" ; |
281 | |
282 | // Apply the UseCharCheck together with the IfFalseCheck. |
283 | // |
284 | // The 'If' fix contains the other, so that is the one that has to be applied. |
285 | // } else if (int a = 0) { |
286 | // ^^^ -> char |
287 | // ~~~~~~~~~ -> false |
288 | const char CharIfFix[] = |
289 | R"(void f() { |
290 | if (false) { |
291 | } else if (false) { |
292 | char potato = 0; |
293 | if (false) potato; |
294 | } |
295 | })" ; |
296 | Res = runCheckOnCode<UseCharCheck, IfFalseCheck>(Code); |
297 | EXPECT_EQ(CharIfFix, Res); |
298 | Res = runCheckOnCode<IfFalseCheck, UseCharCheck>(Code); |
299 | EXPECT_EQ(CharIfFix, Res); |
300 | |
301 | // Apply the IfFalseCheck with the StartsWithPotaCheck. |
302 | // |
303 | // The 'If' replacement is bigger here. |
304 | // if (char potato = 0) { |
305 | // ^^^^^^ -> tomato |
306 | // ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -> false |
307 | // |
308 | // But the refactoring is the one that contains the other here: |
309 | // char potato = 0; |
310 | // ^^^^^^ -> tomato |
311 | // if (potato) potato; |
312 | // ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^ -> tomato, tomato |
313 | // ~~~~~~ -> false |
314 | const char IfStartsFix[] = |
315 | R"(void f() { |
316 | if (false) { |
317 | } else if (false) { |
318 | char tomato = 0; |
319 | if (tomato) tomato; |
320 | } |
321 | })" ; |
322 | Res = runCheckOnCode<IfFalseCheck, StartsWithPotaCheck>(Code); |
323 | EXPECT_EQ(IfStartsFix, Res); |
324 | Res = runCheckOnCode<StartsWithPotaCheck, IfFalseCheck>(Code); |
325 | EXPECT_EQ(IfStartsFix, Res); |
326 | } |
327 | |
328 | TEST(OverlappingReplacements, TwoReplacementsInsideOne) { |
329 | std::string Res; |
330 | const char Code[] = |
331 | R"(void f() { |
332 | if (int potato = 0) { |
333 | int a = 0; |
334 | } |
335 | })" ; |
336 | |
337 | // The two smallest replacements should not be applied. |
338 | // if (int potato = 0) { |
339 | // ^^^^^^ -> tomato |
340 | // *** -> char |
341 | // ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -> false |
342 | // But other errors from the same checks should not be affected. |
343 | // int a = 0; |
344 | // *** -> char |
345 | const char Fix[] = |
346 | R"(void f() { |
347 | if (false) { |
348 | char a = 0; |
349 | } |
350 | })" ; |
351 | Res = runCheckOnCode<UseCharCheck, IfFalseCheck, StartsWithPotaCheck>(Code); |
352 | EXPECT_EQ(Fix, Res); |
353 | Res = runCheckOnCode<StartsWithPotaCheck, IfFalseCheck, UseCharCheck>(Code); |
354 | EXPECT_EQ(Fix, Res); |
355 | } |
356 | |
357 | TEST(OverlappingReplacementsTest, |
358 | ApplyAtMostOneOfTheChangesWhenPartialOverlapping) { |
359 | std::string Res; |
360 | const char Code[] = |
361 | R"(void f() { |
362 | if (int potato = 0) { |
363 | int a = potato; |
364 | } |
365 | })" ; |
366 | |
367 | // These two replacements overlap, but none of them is completely contained |
368 | // inside the other. |
369 | // if (int potato = 0) { |
370 | // ^^^^^^ -> tomato |
371 | // ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -> false |
372 | // int a = potato; |
373 | // ^^^^^^ -> tomato |
374 | // |
375 | // The 'StartsWithPotaCheck' fix has endpoints inside the 'IfFalseCheck' fix, |
376 | // so it is going to be set as inapplicable. The 'if' fix will be applied. |
377 | const char IfFix[] = |
378 | R"(void f() { |
379 | if (false) { |
380 | int a = potato; |
381 | } |
382 | })" ; |
383 | Res = runCheckOnCode<IfFalseCheck, StartsWithPotaCheck>(Code); |
384 | EXPECT_EQ(IfFix, Res); |
385 | } |
386 | |
387 | TEST(OverlappingReplacementsTest, TwoErrorsHavePerfectOverlapping) { |
388 | std::string Res; |
389 | const char Code[] = |
390 | R"(void f() { |
391 | int potato = 0; |
392 | potato += potato * potato; |
393 | if (char a = potato) potato; |
394 | })" ; |
395 | |
396 | // StartsWithPotaCheck will try to refactor 'potato' into 'tomato', and |
397 | // EndsWithTatoCheck will try to use 'pomelo'. Both fixes have the same set of |
398 | // ranges. This is a corner case of one error completely containing another: |
399 | // the other completely contains the first one as well. Both errors are |
400 | // discarded. |
401 | |
402 | Res = runCheckOnCode<StartsWithPotaCheck, EndsWithTatoCheck>(Code); |
403 | EXPECT_EQ(Code, Res); |
404 | } |
405 | |
406 | } // namespace test |
407 | } // namespace tidy |
408 | } // namespace clang |
409 | |