| 1 | //===- ThreadSafetyLogical.cpp ---------------------------------*- C++ --*-===// |
| 2 | // |
| 3 | // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. |
| 4 | // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. |
| 5 | // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception |
| 6 | // |
| 7 | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| 8 | // This file defines a representation for logical expressions with SExpr leaves |
| 9 | // that are used as part of fact-checking capability expressions. |
| 10 | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| 11 | |
| 12 | #include "clang/Analysis/Analyses/ThreadSafetyLogical.h" |
| 13 | |
| 14 | using namespace llvm; |
| 15 | using namespace clang::threadSafety::lexpr; |
| 16 | |
| 17 | // Implication. We implement De Morgan's Laws by maintaining LNeg and RNeg |
| 18 | // to keep track of whether LHS and RHS are negated. |
| 19 | static bool implies(const LExpr *LHS, bool LNeg, const LExpr *RHS, bool RNeg) { |
| 20 | // In comments below, we write => for implication. |
| 21 | |
| 22 | // Calculates the logical AND implication operator. |
| 23 | const auto LeftAndOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) { |
| 24 | return implies(LHS: A->left(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg) && |
| 25 | implies(LHS: A->right(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg); |
| 26 | }; |
| 27 | const auto RightAndOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) { |
| 28 | return implies(LHS, LNeg, RHS: A->left(), RNeg) && |
| 29 | implies(LHS, LNeg, RHS: A->right(), RNeg); |
| 30 | }; |
| 31 | |
| 32 | // Calculates the logical OR implication operator. |
| 33 | const auto LeftOrOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) { |
| 34 | return implies(LHS: A->left(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg) || |
| 35 | implies(LHS: A->right(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg); |
| 36 | }; |
| 37 | const auto RightOrOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) { |
| 38 | return implies(LHS, LNeg, RHS: A->left(), RNeg) || |
| 39 | implies(LHS, LNeg, RHS: A->right(), RNeg); |
| 40 | }; |
| 41 | |
| 42 | // Recurse on right. |
| 43 | switch (RHS->kind()) { |
| 44 | case LExpr::And: |
| 45 | // When performing right recursion: |
| 46 | // C => A & B [if] C => A and C => B |
| 47 | // When performing right recursion (negated): |
| 48 | // C => !(A & B) [if] C => !A | !B [===] C => !A or C => !B |
| 49 | return RNeg ? RightOrOperator(cast<And>(Val: RHS)) |
| 50 | : RightAndOperator(cast<And>(Val: RHS)); |
| 51 | case LExpr::Or: |
| 52 | // When performing right recursion: |
| 53 | // C => (A | B) [if] C => A or C => B |
| 54 | // When performing right recursion (negated): |
| 55 | // C => !(A | B) [if] C => !A & !B [===] C => !A and C => !B |
| 56 | return RNeg ? RightAndOperator(cast<Or>(Val: RHS)) |
| 57 | : RightOrOperator(cast<Or>(Val: RHS)); |
| 58 | case LExpr::Not: |
| 59 | // Note that C => !A is very different from !(C => A). It would be incorrect |
| 60 | // to return !implies(LHS, RHS). |
| 61 | return implies(LHS, LNeg, RHS: cast<Not>(Val: RHS)->exp(), RNeg: !RNeg); |
| 62 | case LExpr::Terminal: |
| 63 | // After reaching the terminal, it's time to recurse on the left. |
| 64 | break; |
| 65 | } |
| 66 | |
| 67 | // RHS is now a terminal. Recurse on Left. |
| 68 | switch (LHS->kind()) { |
| 69 | case LExpr::And: |
| 70 | // When performing left recursion: |
| 71 | // A & B => C [if] A => C or B => C |
| 72 | // When performing left recursion (negated): |
| 73 | // !(A & B) => C [if] !A | !B => C [===] !A => C and !B => C |
| 74 | return LNeg ? LeftAndOperator(cast<And>(Val: LHS)) |
| 75 | : LeftOrOperator(cast<And>(Val: LHS)); |
| 76 | case LExpr::Or: |
| 77 | // When performing left recursion: |
| 78 | // A | B => C [if] A => C and B => C |
| 79 | // When performing left recursion (negated): |
| 80 | // !(A | B) => C [if] !A & !B => C [===] !A => C or !B => C |
| 81 | return LNeg ? LeftOrOperator(cast<Or>(Val: LHS)) |
| 82 | : LeftAndOperator(cast<Or>(Val: LHS)); |
| 83 | case LExpr::Not: |
| 84 | // Note that A => !C is very different from !(A => C). It would be incorrect |
| 85 | // to return !implies(LHS, RHS). |
| 86 | return implies(LHS: cast<Not>(Val: LHS)->exp(), LNeg: !LNeg, RHS, RNeg); |
| 87 | case LExpr::Terminal: |
| 88 | // After reaching the terminal, it's time to perform identity comparisons. |
| 89 | break; |
| 90 | } |
| 91 | |
| 92 | // A => A |
| 93 | // !A => !A |
| 94 | if (LNeg != RNeg) |
| 95 | return false; |
| 96 | |
| 97 | // FIXME -- this should compare SExprs for equality, not pointer equality. |
| 98 | return cast<Terminal>(Val: LHS)->expr() == cast<Terminal>(Val: RHS)->expr(); |
| 99 | } |
| 100 | |
| 101 | namespace clang { |
| 102 | namespace threadSafety { |
| 103 | namespace lexpr { |
| 104 | |
| 105 | bool implies(const LExpr *LHS, const LExpr *RHS) { |
| 106 | // Start out by assuming that LHS and RHS are not negated. |
| 107 | return ::implies(LHS, LNeg: false, RHS, RNeg: false); |
| 108 | } |
| 109 | } |
| 110 | } |
| 111 | } |
| 112 | |