| 1 | //===- unittests/Analysis/CFGDominatorTree.cpp - CFG tests ----------------===// |
| 2 | // |
| 3 | // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. |
| 4 | // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. |
| 5 | // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception |
| 6 | // |
| 7 | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| 8 | |
| 9 | #include "CFGBuildResult.h" |
| 10 | #include "clang/Analysis/Analyses/Dominators.h" |
| 11 | #include "gtest/gtest.h" |
| 12 | |
| 13 | namespace clang { |
| 14 | namespace analysis { |
| 15 | namespace { |
| 16 | |
| 17 | TEST(CFGDominatorTree, DomTree) { |
| 18 | const char *Code = R"(enum Kind { |
| 19 | A |
| 20 | }; |
| 21 | |
| 22 | void f() { |
| 23 | switch(Kind{}) { |
| 24 | case A: |
| 25 | break; |
| 26 | } |
| 27 | })" ; |
| 28 | BuildResult Result = BuildCFG(Code); |
| 29 | EXPECT_EQ(BuildResult::BuiltCFG, Result.getStatus()); |
| 30 | |
| 31 | // [B3 (ENTRY)] -> [B1] -> [B2] -> [B0 (EXIT)] |
| 32 | // switch case A |
| 33 | |
| 34 | CFG *cfg = Result.getCFG(); |
| 35 | |
| 36 | // Basic correctness checks. |
| 37 | EXPECT_EQ(cfg->size(), 4u); |
| 38 | |
| 39 | CFGBlock *ExitBlock = *cfg->begin(); |
| 40 | EXPECT_EQ(ExitBlock, &cfg->getExit()); |
| 41 | |
| 42 | CFGBlock *SwitchBlock = *(cfg->begin() + 1); |
| 43 | |
| 44 | CFGBlock *CaseABlock = *(cfg->begin() + 2); |
| 45 | |
| 46 | CFGBlock *EntryBlock = *(cfg->begin() + 3); |
| 47 | EXPECT_EQ(EntryBlock, &cfg->getEntry()); |
| 48 | |
| 49 | // Test the dominator tree. |
| 50 | CFGDomTree Dom; |
| 51 | Dom.buildDominatorTree(cfg); |
| 52 | |
| 53 | EXPECT_TRUE(Dom.dominates(ExitBlock, ExitBlock)); |
| 54 | EXPECT_FALSE(Dom.properlyDominates(ExitBlock, ExitBlock)); |
| 55 | EXPECT_TRUE(Dom.dominates(CaseABlock, ExitBlock)); |
| 56 | EXPECT_TRUE(Dom.dominates(SwitchBlock, ExitBlock)); |
| 57 | EXPECT_TRUE(Dom.dominates(EntryBlock, ExitBlock)); |
| 58 | |
| 59 | EXPECT_TRUE(Dom.dominates(CaseABlock, CaseABlock)); |
| 60 | EXPECT_FALSE(Dom.properlyDominates(CaseABlock, CaseABlock)); |
| 61 | EXPECT_TRUE(Dom.dominates(SwitchBlock, CaseABlock)); |
| 62 | EXPECT_TRUE(Dom.dominates(EntryBlock, CaseABlock)); |
| 63 | |
| 64 | EXPECT_TRUE(Dom.dominates(SwitchBlock, SwitchBlock)); |
| 65 | EXPECT_FALSE(Dom.properlyDominates(SwitchBlock, SwitchBlock)); |
| 66 | EXPECT_TRUE(Dom.dominates(EntryBlock, SwitchBlock)); |
| 67 | |
| 68 | EXPECT_TRUE(Dom.dominates(EntryBlock, EntryBlock)); |
| 69 | EXPECT_FALSE(Dom.properlyDominates(EntryBlock, EntryBlock)); |
| 70 | |
| 71 | // Test the post dominator tree. |
| 72 | |
| 73 | CFGPostDomTree PostDom; |
| 74 | PostDom.buildDominatorTree(cfg); |
| 75 | |
| 76 | EXPECT_TRUE(PostDom.dominates(ExitBlock, EntryBlock)); |
| 77 | EXPECT_TRUE(PostDom.dominates(CaseABlock, EntryBlock)); |
| 78 | EXPECT_TRUE(PostDom.dominates(SwitchBlock, EntryBlock)); |
| 79 | EXPECT_TRUE(PostDom.dominates(EntryBlock, EntryBlock)); |
| 80 | EXPECT_FALSE(Dom.properlyDominates(EntryBlock, EntryBlock)); |
| 81 | |
| 82 | EXPECT_TRUE(PostDom.dominates(ExitBlock, SwitchBlock)); |
| 83 | EXPECT_TRUE(PostDom.dominates(CaseABlock, SwitchBlock)); |
| 84 | EXPECT_TRUE(PostDom.dominates(SwitchBlock, SwitchBlock)); |
| 85 | EXPECT_FALSE(Dom.properlyDominates(SwitchBlock, SwitchBlock)); |
| 86 | |
| 87 | EXPECT_TRUE(PostDom.dominates(ExitBlock, CaseABlock)); |
| 88 | EXPECT_TRUE(PostDom.dominates(CaseABlock, CaseABlock)); |
| 89 | EXPECT_FALSE(Dom.properlyDominates(CaseABlock, CaseABlock)); |
| 90 | |
| 91 | EXPECT_TRUE(PostDom.dominates(ExitBlock, ExitBlock)); |
| 92 | EXPECT_FALSE(Dom.properlyDominates(ExitBlock, ExitBlock)); |
| 93 | |
| 94 | // Tests for the post dominator tree's virtual root. |
| 95 | EXPECT_TRUE(PostDom.dominates(nullptr, EntryBlock)); |
| 96 | EXPECT_TRUE(PostDom.dominates(nullptr, SwitchBlock)); |
| 97 | EXPECT_TRUE(PostDom.dominates(nullptr, CaseABlock)); |
| 98 | EXPECT_TRUE(PostDom.dominates(nullptr, ExitBlock)); |
| 99 | } |
| 100 | |
| 101 | TEST(CFGDominatorTree, ControlDependency) { |
| 102 | const char *Code = R"(bool coin(); |
| 103 | |
| 104 | void funcWithBranch() { |
| 105 | int x = 0; |
| 106 | if (coin()) { |
| 107 | if (coin()) { |
| 108 | x = 5; |
| 109 | } |
| 110 | int j = 10 / x; |
| 111 | (void)j; |
| 112 | } |
| 113 | };)" ; |
| 114 | BuildResult Result = BuildCFG(Code); |
| 115 | EXPECT_EQ(BuildResult::BuiltCFG, Result.getStatus()); |
| 116 | |
| 117 | // 1st if 2nd if |
| 118 | // [B5 (ENTRY)] -> [B4] -> [B3] -> [B2] -> [B1] -> [B0 (EXIT)] |
| 119 | // \ \ / / |
| 120 | // \ -------------> / |
| 121 | // ------------------------------> |
| 122 | |
| 123 | CFG *cfg = Result.getCFG(); |
| 124 | |
| 125 | // Basic correctness checks. |
| 126 | EXPECT_EQ(cfg->size(), 6u); |
| 127 | |
| 128 | CFGBlock *ExitBlock = *cfg->begin(); |
| 129 | EXPECT_EQ(ExitBlock, &cfg->getExit()); |
| 130 | |
| 131 | CFGBlock *NullDerefBlock = *(cfg->begin() + 1); |
| 132 | |
| 133 | CFGBlock *SecondThenBlock = *(cfg->begin() + 2); |
| 134 | |
| 135 | CFGBlock *SecondIfBlock = *(cfg->begin() + 3); |
| 136 | |
| 137 | CFGBlock *FirstIfBlock = *(cfg->begin() + 4); |
| 138 | |
| 139 | CFGBlock *EntryBlock = *(cfg->begin() + 5); |
| 140 | EXPECT_EQ(EntryBlock, &cfg->getEntry()); |
| 141 | |
| 142 | ControlDependencyCalculator Control(cfg); |
| 143 | |
| 144 | EXPECT_TRUE(Control.isControlDependent(SecondThenBlock, SecondIfBlock)); |
| 145 | EXPECT_TRUE(Control.isControlDependent(SecondIfBlock, FirstIfBlock)); |
| 146 | EXPECT_FALSE(Control.isControlDependent(NullDerefBlock, SecondIfBlock)); |
| 147 | } |
| 148 | |
| 149 | TEST(CFGDominatorTree, ControlDependencyWithLoops) { |
| 150 | const char *Code = R"(int test3() { |
| 151 | int x,y,z; |
| 152 | |
| 153 | x = y = z = 1; |
| 154 | if (x > 0) { |
| 155 | while (x >= 0){ |
| 156 | while (y >= x) { |
| 157 | x = x-1; |
| 158 | y = y/2; |
| 159 | } |
| 160 | } |
| 161 | } |
| 162 | z = y; |
| 163 | |
| 164 | return 0; |
| 165 | })" ; |
| 166 | BuildResult Result = BuildCFG(Code); |
| 167 | EXPECT_EQ(BuildResult::BuiltCFG, Result.getStatus()); |
| 168 | |
| 169 | // <- [B2] <- |
| 170 | // / \ |
| 171 | // [B8 (ENTRY)] -> [B7] -> [B6] ---> [B5] -> [B4] -> [B3] |
| 172 | // \ | \ / |
| 173 | // \ | <------------- |
| 174 | // \ \ |
| 175 | // --------> [B1] -> [B0 (EXIT)] |
| 176 | |
| 177 | CFG *cfg = Result.getCFG(); |
| 178 | |
| 179 | ControlDependencyCalculator Control(cfg); |
| 180 | |
| 181 | auto GetBlock = [cfg] (unsigned Index) -> CFGBlock * { |
| 182 | assert(Index < cfg->size()); |
| 183 | return *(cfg->begin() + Index); |
| 184 | }; |
| 185 | |
| 186 | // While not immediately obvious, the second block in fact post dominates the |
| 187 | // fifth, hence B5 is not a control dependency of 2. |
| 188 | EXPECT_FALSE(Control.isControlDependent(GetBlock(5), GetBlock(2))); |
| 189 | } |
| 190 | |
| 191 | |
| 192 | } // namespace |
| 193 | } // namespace analysis |
| 194 | } // namespace clang |
| 195 | |