1 | // XFAIL: * |
2 | //// Suboptimal coverage, see below. |
3 | |
4 | // REQUIRES: lldb |
5 | // UNSUPPORTED: system-windows |
6 | // RUN: %clang -std=gnu11 -O3 -glldb %s -o %t |
7 | // RUN: %dexter --fail-lt 1.0 -w --debugger lldb --binary %t -- %s |
8 | |
9 | //// Check that escaped local 'param' in function 'fun' has sensible debug info |
10 | //// after the escaping function 'use' gets arg promotion (int* -> int). Currently |
11 | //// we lose track of param after the loop header. |
12 | |
13 | int g = 0; |
14 | //// A no-inline, read-only function with internal linkage is a good candidate |
15 | //// for arg promotion. |
16 | __attribute__((__noinline__)) |
17 | static void use(const int* p) { |
18 | //// Promoted args would be a good candidate for an DW_OP_implicit_pointer. |
19 | //// This desirable behaviour is checked for in the test implicit-ptr.c. |
20 | g = *p; |
21 | } |
22 | |
23 | __attribute__((__noinline__)) |
24 | void do_thing(int x) { |
25 | g *= x; |
26 | } |
27 | |
28 | __attribute__((__noinline__)) |
29 | int fun(int param) { |
30 | do_thing(x: 0); // DexLabel('s2') |
31 | for (int i = 0; i < param; ++i) { |
32 | use(p: ¶m); |
33 | } |
34 | |
35 | //// x86 loop body looks like this, with param in ebx: |
36 | //// 4004b0: mov edi,ebx |
37 | //// 4004b2: call 4004d0 <_ZL3usePKi> |
38 | //// 4004b7: add ebp,0xffffffff |
39 | //// 4004ba: jne 4004b0 <_Z3funi+0x20> |
40 | |
41 | //// But we lose track of param's location before the loop: |
42 | //// DW_TAG_formal_parameter |
43 | //// DW_AT_location (0x00000039: |
44 | //// [0x0000000000400490, 0x0000000000400495): DW_OP_reg5 RDI |
45 | //// [0x0000000000400495, 0x00000000004004a2): DW_OP_reg3 RBX) |
46 | //// DW_AT_name ("param") |
47 | |
48 | return g; // DexLabel('s3') |
49 | } |
50 | |
51 | int main() { |
52 | return fun(param: 5); |
53 | } |
54 | |
55 | // DexExpectWatchValue('*p', 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, on_line=ref('s1')) |
56 | // DexExpectWatchValue('param', 5, from_line=ref('s2'), to_line=ref('s3')) |
57 | |