| 1 | struct NoCopyCstr { |
|---|
| 2 | NoCopyCstr() {} |
|---|
| 3 | // No copy constructor but a move constructor means we have an |
|---|
| 4 | // implicitly deleted copy constructor (C++11 [class.copy]p7, p18). |
|---|
| 5 | NoCopyCstr(NoCopyCstr &&); |
|---|
| 6 | }; |
|---|
| 7 | struct IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr { |
|---|
| 8 | // This field indirectly deletes the implicit copy constructor. |
|---|
| 9 | NoCopyCstr field; |
|---|
| 10 | // Completing in the constructor or constructing the class |
|---|
| 11 | // will cause Sema to declare the special members of IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr. |
|---|
| 12 | // If we correctly set the deleted implicit copy constructor in NoCopyCstr then this |
|---|
| 13 | // should have propagated to this record and Clang won't crash. |
|---|
| 14 | IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr() { //%self.expect_expr("IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr x; 1+1", result_type="int", result_value="2") |
|---|
| 15 | //%self.dbg.GetCommandInterpreter().HandleCompletion("e ", len("e "), 0, -1, lldb.SBStringList()) |
|---|
| 16 | } |
|---|
| 17 | }; |
|---|
| 18 | int main() { |
|---|
| 19 | IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr{}; |
|---|
| 20 | } |
|---|
| 21 | |
|---|
