| 1 | // Internal | 
| 2 | use crate::builder::StyledStr; | 
|---|
| 3 | use crate::builder::{Arg, ArgGroup, ArgPredicate, Command, PossibleValue}; | 
|---|
| 4 | use crate::error::{Error, Result as ClapResult}; | 
|---|
| 5 | use crate::output::Usage; | 
|---|
| 6 | use crate::parser::ArgMatcher; | 
|---|
| 7 | use crate::util::ChildGraph; | 
|---|
| 8 | use crate::util::FlatMap; | 
|---|
| 9 | use crate::util::FlatSet; | 
|---|
| 10 | use crate::util::Id; | 
|---|
| 11 | use crate::INTERNAL_ERROR_MSG; | 
|---|
| 12 |  | 
|---|
| 13 | pub(crate) struct Validator<'cmd> { | 
|---|
| 14 | cmd: &'cmd Command, | 
|---|
| 15 | required: ChildGraph<Id>, | 
|---|
| 16 | } | 
|---|
| 17 |  | 
|---|
| 18 | impl<'cmd> Validator<'cmd> { | 
|---|
| 19 | pub(crate) fn new(cmd: &'cmd Command) -> Self { | 
|---|
| 20 | let required = cmd.required_graph(); | 
|---|
| 21 | Validator { cmd, required } | 
|---|
| 22 | } | 
|---|
| 23 |  | 
|---|
| 24 | pub(crate) fn validate(&mut self, matcher: &mut ArgMatcher) -> ClapResult<()> { | 
|---|
| 25 | debug!( "Validator::validate"); | 
|---|
| 26 | let conflicts = Conflicts::with_args(self.cmd, matcher); | 
|---|
| 27 | let has_subcmd = matcher.subcommand_name().is_some(); | 
|---|
| 28 |  | 
|---|
| 29 | if !has_subcmd && self.cmd.is_arg_required_else_help_set() { | 
|---|
| 30 | let num_user_values = matcher | 
|---|
| 31 | .args() | 
|---|
| 32 | .filter(|(_, matched)| matched.check_explicit(&ArgPredicate::IsPresent)) | 
|---|
| 33 | .count(); | 
|---|
| 34 | if num_user_values == 0 { | 
|---|
| 35 | let message = self.cmd.write_help_err(false); | 
|---|
| 36 | return Err(Error::display_help_error(self.cmd, message)); | 
|---|
| 37 | } | 
|---|
| 38 | } | 
|---|
| 39 | if !has_subcmd && self.cmd.is_subcommand_required_set() { | 
|---|
| 40 | let bn = self.cmd.get_bin_name_fallback(); | 
|---|
| 41 | return Err(Error::missing_subcommand( | 
|---|
| 42 | self.cmd, | 
|---|
| 43 | bn.to_string(), | 
|---|
| 44 | self.cmd | 
|---|
| 45 | .all_subcommand_names() | 
|---|
| 46 | .map(|s| s.to_owned()) | 
|---|
| 47 | .collect::<Vec<_>>(), | 
|---|
| 48 | Usage::new(self.cmd) | 
|---|
| 49 | .required(&self.required) | 
|---|
| 50 | .create_usage_with_title(&[]), | 
|---|
| 51 | )); | 
|---|
| 52 | } | 
|---|
| 53 |  | 
|---|
| 54 | ok!(self.validate_conflicts(matcher, &conflicts)); | 
|---|
| 55 | if !(self.cmd.is_subcommand_negates_reqs_set() && has_subcmd) { | 
|---|
| 56 | ok!(self.validate_required(matcher, &conflicts)); | 
|---|
| 57 | } | 
|---|
| 58 |  | 
|---|
| 59 | Ok(()) | 
|---|
| 60 | } | 
|---|
| 61 |  | 
|---|
| 62 | fn validate_conflicts( | 
|---|
| 63 | &mut self, | 
|---|
| 64 | matcher: &ArgMatcher, | 
|---|
| 65 | conflicts: &Conflicts, | 
|---|
| 66 | ) -> ClapResult<()> { | 
|---|
| 67 | debug!( "Validator::validate_conflicts"); | 
|---|
| 68 |  | 
|---|
| 69 | ok!(self.validate_exclusive(matcher)); | 
|---|
| 70 |  | 
|---|
| 71 | for (arg_id, _) in matcher | 
|---|
| 72 | .args() | 
|---|
| 73 | .filter(|(_, matched)| matched.check_explicit(&ArgPredicate::IsPresent)) | 
|---|
| 74 | .filter(|(arg_id, _)| self.cmd.find(arg_id).is_some()) | 
|---|
| 75 | { | 
|---|
| 76 | debug!( "Validator::validate_conflicts::iter: id={arg_id:?}"); | 
|---|
| 77 | let conflicts = conflicts.gather_conflicts(self.cmd, arg_id); | 
|---|
| 78 | ok!(self.build_conflict_err(arg_id, &conflicts, matcher)); | 
|---|
| 79 | } | 
|---|
| 80 |  | 
|---|
| 81 | Ok(()) | 
|---|
| 82 | } | 
|---|
| 83 |  | 
|---|
| 84 | fn validate_exclusive(&self, matcher: &ArgMatcher) -> ClapResult<()> { | 
|---|
| 85 | debug!( "Validator::validate_exclusive"); | 
|---|
| 86 | let args_count = matcher | 
|---|
| 87 | .args() | 
|---|
| 88 | .filter(|(arg_id, matched)| { | 
|---|
| 89 | matched.check_explicit(&ArgPredicate::IsPresent) | 
|---|
| 90 | // Avoid including our own groups by checking none of them.  If a group is present, the | 
|---|
| 91 | // args for the group will be. | 
|---|
| 92 | && self.cmd.find(arg_id).is_some() | 
|---|
| 93 | }) | 
|---|
| 94 | .count(); | 
|---|
| 95 | if args_count <= 1 { | 
|---|
| 96 | // Nothing present to conflict with | 
|---|
| 97 | return Ok(()); | 
|---|
| 98 | } | 
|---|
| 99 |  | 
|---|
| 100 | matcher | 
|---|
| 101 | .args() | 
|---|
| 102 | .filter(|(_, matched)| matched.check_explicit(&ArgPredicate::IsPresent)) | 
|---|
| 103 | .find_map(|(id, _)| { | 
|---|
| 104 | debug!( "Validator::validate_exclusive:iter:{id:?}"); | 
|---|
| 105 | self.cmd | 
|---|
| 106 | .find(id) | 
|---|
| 107 | // Find `arg`s which are exclusive but also appear with other args. | 
|---|
| 108 | .filter(|&arg| arg.is_exclusive_set() && args_count > 1) | 
|---|
| 109 | }) | 
|---|
| 110 | .map(|arg| { | 
|---|
| 111 | // Throw an error for the first conflict found. | 
|---|
| 112 | Err(Error::argument_conflict( | 
|---|
| 113 | self.cmd, | 
|---|
| 114 | arg.to_string(), | 
|---|
| 115 | Vec::new(), | 
|---|
| 116 | Usage::new(self.cmd) | 
|---|
| 117 | .required(&self.required) | 
|---|
| 118 | .create_usage_with_title(&[]), | 
|---|
| 119 | )) | 
|---|
| 120 | }) | 
|---|
| 121 | .unwrap_or(Ok(())) | 
|---|
| 122 | } | 
|---|
| 123 |  | 
|---|
| 124 | fn build_conflict_err( | 
|---|
| 125 | &self, | 
|---|
| 126 | name: &Id, | 
|---|
| 127 | conflict_ids: &[Id], | 
|---|
| 128 | matcher: &ArgMatcher, | 
|---|
| 129 | ) -> ClapResult<()> { | 
|---|
| 130 | if conflict_ids.is_empty() { | 
|---|
| 131 | return Ok(()); | 
|---|
| 132 | } | 
|---|
| 133 |  | 
|---|
| 134 | debug!( "Validator::build_conflict_err: name={name:?}"); | 
|---|
| 135 | let mut seen = FlatSet::new(); | 
|---|
| 136 | let conflicts = conflict_ids | 
|---|
| 137 | .iter() | 
|---|
| 138 | .flat_map(|c_id| { | 
|---|
| 139 | if self.cmd.find_group(c_id).is_some() { | 
|---|
| 140 | self.cmd.unroll_args_in_group(c_id) | 
|---|
| 141 | } else { | 
|---|
| 142 | vec![c_id.clone()] | 
|---|
| 143 | } | 
|---|
| 144 | }) | 
|---|
| 145 | .filter_map(|c_id| { | 
|---|
| 146 | seen.insert(c_id.clone()).then(|| { | 
|---|
| 147 | let c_arg = self.cmd.find(&c_id).expect(INTERNAL_ERROR_MSG); | 
|---|
| 148 | c_arg.to_string() | 
|---|
| 149 | }) | 
|---|
| 150 | }) | 
|---|
| 151 | .collect(); | 
|---|
| 152 |  | 
|---|
| 153 | let former_arg = self.cmd.find(name).expect(INTERNAL_ERROR_MSG); | 
|---|
| 154 | let usg = self.build_conflict_err_usage(matcher, conflict_ids); | 
|---|
| 155 | Err(Error::argument_conflict( | 
|---|
| 156 | self.cmd, | 
|---|
| 157 | former_arg.to_string(), | 
|---|
| 158 | conflicts, | 
|---|
| 159 | usg, | 
|---|
| 160 | )) | 
|---|
| 161 | } | 
|---|
| 162 |  | 
|---|
| 163 | fn build_conflict_err_usage( | 
|---|
| 164 | &self, | 
|---|
| 165 | matcher: &ArgMatcher, | 
|---|
| 166 | conflicting_keys: &[Id], | 
|---|
| 167 | ) -> Option<StyledStr> { | 
|---|
| 168 | let used_filtered: Vec<Id> = matcher | 
|---|
| 169 | .args() | 
|---|
| 170 | .filter(|(_, matched)| matched.check_explicit(&ArgPredicate::IsPresent)) | 
|---|
| 171 | .map(|(n, _)| n) | 
|---|
| 172 | .filter(|n| { | 
|---|
| 173 | // Filter out the args we don't want to specify. | 
|---|
| 174 | self.cmd | 
|---|
| 175 | .find(n) | 
|---|
| 176 | .map(|a| !a.is_hide_set()) | 
|---|
| 177 | .unwrap_or_default() | 
|---|
| 178 | }) | 
|---|
| 179 | .filter(|key| !conflicting_keys.contains(key)) | 
|---|
| 180 | .cloned() | 
|---|
| 181 | .collect(); | 
|---|
| 182 | let required: Vec<Id> = used_filtered | 
|---|
| 183 | .iter() | 
|---|
| 184 | .filter_map(|key| self.cmd.find(key)) | 
|---|
| 185 | .flat_map(|arg| arg.requires.iter().map(|item| &item.1)) | 
|---|
| 186 | .filter(|key| !used_filtered.contains(key) && !conflicting_keys.contains(key)) | 
|---|
| 187 | .chain(used_filtered.iter()) | 
|---|
| 188 | .cloned() | 
|---|
| 189 | .collect(); | 
|---|
| 190 | Usage::new(self.cmd) | 
|---|
| 191 | .required(&self.required) | 
|---|
| 192 | .create_usage_with_title(&required) | 
|---|
| 193 | } | 
|---|
| 194 |  | 
|---|
| 195 | fn gather_requires(&mut self, matcher: &ArgMatcher) { | 
|---|
| 196 | debug!( "Validator::gather_requires"); | 
|---|
| 197 | for (name, matched) in matcher | 
|---|
| 198 | .args() | 
|---|
| 199 | .filter(|(_, matched)| matched.check_explicit(&ArgPredicate::IsPresent)) | 
|---|
| 200 | { | 
|---|
| 201 | debug!( "Validator::gather_requires:iter:{name:?}"); | 
|---|
| 202 | if let Some(arg) = self.cmd.find(name) { | 
|---|
| 203 | let is_relevant = |(val, req_arg): &(ArgPredicate, Id)| -> Option<Id> { | 
|---|
| 204 | let required = matched.check_explicit(val); | 
|---|
| 205 | required.then(|| req_arg.clone()) | 
|---|
| 206 | }; | 
|---|
| 207 |  | 
|---|
| 208 | for req in self.cmd.unroll_arg_requires(is_relevant, arg.get_id()) { | 
|---|
| 209 | self.required.insert(req); | 
|---|
| 210 | } | 
|---|
| 211 | } else if let Some(g) = self.cmd.find_group(name) { | 
|---|
| 212 | debug!( "Validator::gather_requires:iter:{name:?}:group"); | 
|---|
| 213 | for r in &g.requires { | 
|---|
| 214 | self.required.insert(r.clone()); | 
|---|
| 215 | } | 
|---|
| 216 | } | 
|---|
| 217 | } | 
|---|
| 218 | } | 
|---|
| 219 |  | 
|---|
| 220 | fn validate_required(&mut self, matcher: &ArgMatcher, conflicts: &Conflicts) -> ClapResult<()> { | 
|---|
| 221 | debug!( "Validator::validate_required: required={:?}", self.required); | 
|---|
| 222 | self.gather_requires(matcher); | 
|---|
| 223 |  | 
|---|
| 224 | let mut missing_required = Vec::new(); | 
|---|
| 225 | let mut highest_index = 0; | 
|---|
| 226 |  | 
|---|
| 227 | let is_exclusive_present = matcher | 
|---|
| 228 | .args() | 
|---|
| 229 | .filter(|(_, matched)| matched.check_explicit(&ArgPredicate::IsPresent)) | 
|---|
| 230 | .any(|(id, _)| { | 
|---|
| 231 | self.cmd | 
|---|
| 232 | .find(id) | 
|---|
| 233 | .map(|arg| arg.is_exclusive_set()) | 
|---|
| 234 | .unwrap_or_default() | 
|---|
| 235 | }); | 
|---|
| 236 | debug!( "Validator::validate_required: is_exclusive_present={is_exclusive_present}"); | 
|---|
| 237 |  | 
|---|
| 238 | for arg_or_group in self | 
|---|
| 239 | .required | 
|---|
| 240 | .iter() | 
|---|
| 241 | .filter(|r| !matcher.check_explicit(r, &ArgPredicate::IsPresent)) | 
|---|
| 242 | { | 
|---|
| 243 | debug!( "Validator::validate_required:iter:aog={arg_or_group:?}"); | 
|---|
| 244 | if let Some(arg) = self.cmd.find(arg_or_group) { | 
|---|
| 245 | debug!( "Validator::validate_required:iter: This is an arg"); | 
|---|
| 246 | if !is_exclusive_present && !self.is_missing_required_ok(arg, conflicts) { | 
|---|
| 247 | debug!( | 
|---|
| 248 | "Validator::validate_required:iter: Missing {:?}", | 
|---|
| 249 | arg.get_id() | 
|---|
| 250 | ); | 
|---|
| 251 | missing_required.push(arg.get_id().clone()); | 
|---|
| 252 | if !arg.is_last_set() { | 
|---|
| 253 | highest_index = highest_index.max(arg.get_index().unwrap_or(0)); | 
|---|
| 254 | } | 
|---|
| 255 | } | 
|---|
| 256 | } else if let Some(group) = self.cmd.find_group(arg_or_group) { | 
|---|
| 257 | debug!( "Validator::validate_required:iter: This is a group"); | 
|---|
| 258 | if !self | 
|---|
| 259 | .cmd | 
|---|
| 260 | .unroll_args_in_group(&group.id) | 
|---|
| 261 | .iter() | 
|---|
| 262 | .any(|a| matcher.check_explicit(a, &ArgPredicate::IsPresent)) | 
|---|
| 263 | { | 
|---|
| 264 | debug!( | 
|---|
| 265 | "Validator::validate_required:iter: Missing {:?}", | 
|---|
| 266 | group.get_id() | 
|---|
| 267 | ); | 
|---|
| 268 | missing_required.push(group.get_id().clone()); | 
|---|
| 269 | } | 
|---|
| 270 | } | 
|---|
| 271 | } | 
|---|
| 272 |  | 
|---|
| 273 | // Validate the conditionally required args | 
|---|
| 274 | for a in self | 
|---|
| 275 | .cmd | 
|---|
| 276 | .get_arguments() | 
|---|
| 277 | .filter(|a| !matcher.check_explicit(a.get_id(), &ArgPredicate::IsPresent)) | 
|---|
| 278 | { | 
|---|
| 279 | let mut required = false; | 
|---|
| 280 |  | 
|---|
| 281 | for (other, val) in &a.r_ifs { | 
|---|
| 282 | if matcher.check_explicit(other, &ArgPredicate::Equals(val.into())) { | 
|---|
| 283 | debug!( | 
|---|
| 284 | "Validator::validate_required:iter: Missing {:?}", | 
|---|
| 285 | a.get_id() | 
|---|
| 286 | ); | 
|---|
| 287 | required = true; | 
|---|
| 288 | } | 
|---|
| 289 | } | 
|---|
| 290 |  | 
|---|
| 291 | let match_all = a.r_ifs_all.iter().all(|(other, val)| { | 
|---|
| 292 | matcher.check_explicit(other, &ArgPredicate::Equals(val.into())) | 
|---|
| 293 | }); | 
|---|
| 294 | if match_all && !a.r_ifs_all.is_empty() { | 
|---|
| 295 | debug!( | 
|---|
| 296 | "Validator::validate_required:iter: Missing {:?}", | 
|---|
| 297 | a.get_id() | 
|---|
| 298 | ); | 
|---|
| 299 | required = true; | 
|---|
| 300 | } | 
|---|
| 301 |  | 
|---|
| 302 | if (!a.r_unless.is_empty() || !a.r_unless_all.is_empty()) | 
|---|
| 303 | && self.fails_arg_required_unless(a, matcher) | 
|---|
| 304 | { | 
|---|
| 305 | debug!( | 
|---|
| 306 | "Validator::validate_required:iter: Missing {:?}", | 
|---|
| 307 | a.get_id() | 
|---|
| 308 | ); | 
|---|
| 309 | required = true; | 
|---|
| 310 | } | 
|---|
| 311 |  | 
|---|
| 312 | if !is_exclusive_present && required { | 
|---|
| 313 | missing_required.push(a.get_id().clone()); | 
|---|
| 314 | if !a.is_last_set() { | 
|---|
| 315 | highest_index = highest_index.max(a.get_index().unwrap_or(0)); | 
|---|
| 316 | } | 
|---|
| 317 | } | 
|---|
| 318 | } | 
|---|
| 319 |  | 
|---|
| 320 | // For display purposes, include all of the preceding positional arguments | 
|---|
| 321 | if !self.cmd.is_allow_missing_positional_set() { | 
|---|
| 322 | for pos in self | 
|---|
| 323 | .cmd | 
|---|
| 324 | .get_positionals() | 
|---|
| 325 | .filter(|a| !matcher.check_explicit(a.get_id(), &ArgPredicate::IsPresent)) | 
|---|
| 326 | { | 
|---|
| 327 | if pos.get_index() < Some(highest_index) { | 
|---|
| 328 | debug!( | 
|---|
| 329 | "Validator::validate_required:iter: Missing {:?}", | 
|---|
| 330 | pos.get_id() | 
|---|
| 331 | ); | 
|---|
| 332 | missing_required.push(pos.get_id().clone()); | 
|---|
| 333 | } | 
|---|
| 334 | } | 
|---|
| 335 | } | 
|---|
| 336 |  | 
|---|
| 337 | if !missing_required.is_empty() { | 
|---|
| 338 | ok!(self.missing_required_error(matcher, missing_required)); | 
|---|
| 339 | } | 
|---|
| 340 |  | 
|---|
| 341 | Ok(()) | 
|---|
| 342 | } | 
|---|
| 343 |  | 
|---|
| 344 | fn is_missing_required_ok(&self, a: &Arg, conflicts: &Conflicts) -> bool { | 
|---|
| 345 | debug!( "Validator::is_missing_required_ok: {}", a.get_id()); | 
|---|
| 346 | if !conflicts.gather_conflicts(self.cmd, a.get_id()).is_empty() { | 
|---|
| 347 | debug!( "Validator::is_missing_required_ok: true (self)"); | 
|---|
| 348 | return true; | 
|---|
| 349 | } | 
|---|
| 350 | for group_id in self.cmd.groups_for_arg(a.get_id()) { | 
|---|
| 351 | if !conflicts.gather_conflicts(self.cmd, &group_id).is_empty() { | 
|---|
| 352 | debug!( "Validator::is_missing_required_ok: true ({group_id})"); | 
|---|
| 353 | return true; | 
|---|
| 354 | } | 
|---|
| 355 | } | 
|---|
| 356 | false | 
|---|
| 357 | } | 
|---|
| 358 |  | 
|---|
| 359 | // Failing a required unless means, the arg's "unless" wasn't present, and neither were they | 
|---|
| 360 | fn fails_arg_required_unless(&self, a: &Arg, matcher: &ArgMatcher) -> bool { | 
|---|
| 361 | debug!( "Validator::fails_arg_required_unless: a={:?}", a.get_id()); | 
|---|
| 362 | let exists = |id| matcher.check_explicit(id, &ArgPredicate::IsPresent); | 
|---|
| 363 |  | 
|---|
| 364 | (a.r_unless_all.is_empty() || !a.r_unless_all.iter().all(exists)) | 
|---|
| 365 | && !a.r_unless.iter().any(exists) | 
|---|
| 366 | } | 
|---|
| 367 |  | 
|---|
| 368 | // `req_args`: an arg to include in the error even if not used | 
|---|
| 369 | fn missing_required_error( | 
|---|
| 370 | &self, | 
|---|
| 371 | matcher: &ArgMatcher, | 
|---|
| 372 | raw_req_args: Vec<Id>, | 
|---|
| 373 | ) -> ClapResult<()> { | 
|---|
| 374 | debug!( "Validator::missing_required_error; incl={raw_req_args:?}"); | 
|---|
| 375 | debug!( | 
|---|
| 376 | "Validator::missing_required_error: reqs={:?}", | 
|---|
| 377 | self.required | 
|---|
| 378 | ); | 
|---|
| 379 |  | 
|---|
| 380 | let usg = Usage::new(self.cmd).required(&self.required); | 
|---|
| 381 |  | 
|---|
| 382 | let req_args = { | 
|---|
| 383 | #[ cfg(feature = "usage")] | 
|---|
| 384 | { | 
|---|
| 385 | usg.get_required_usage_from(&raw_req_args, Some(matcher), true) | 
|---|
| 386 | .into_iter() | 
|---|
| 387 | .map(|s| s.to_string()) | 
|---|
| 388 | .collect::<Vec<_>>() | 
|---|
| 389 | } | 
|---|
| 390 |  | 
|---|
| 391 | #[ cfg(not(feature = "usage"))] | 
|---|
| 392 | { | 
|---|
| 393 | raw_req_args | 
|---|
| 394 | .iter() | 
|---|
| 395 | .map(|id| { | 
|---|
| 396 | if let Some(arg) = self.cmd.find(id) { | 
|---|
| 397 | arg.to_string() | 
|---|
| 398 | } else if let Some(_group) = self.cmd.find_group(id) { | 
|---|
| 399 | self.cmd.format_group(id).to_string() | 
|---|
| 400 | } else { | 
|---|
| 401 | debug_assert!(false, "id={id:?} is unknown"); | 
|---|
| 402 | "".to_owned() | 
|---|
| 403 | } | 
|---|
| 404 | }) | 
|---|
| 405 | .collect::<FlatSet<_>>() | 
|---|
| 406 | .into_iter() | 
|---|
| 407 | .collect::<Vec<_>>() | 
|---|
| 408 | } | 
|---|
| 409 | }; | 
|---|
| 410 |  | 
|---|
| 411 | debug!( "Validator::missing_required_error: req_args={req_args:#?}"); | 
|---|
| 412 |  | 
|---|
| 413 | let used: Vec<Id> = matcher | 
|---|
| 414 | .args() | 
|---|
| 415 | .filter(|(_, matched)| matched.check_explicit(&ArgPredicate::IsPresent)) | 
|---|
| 416 | .map(|(n, _)| n) | 
|---|
| 417 | .filter(|n| { | 
|---|
| 418 | // Filter out the args we don't want to specify. | 
|---|
| 419 | self.cmd | 
|---|
| 420 | .find(n) | 
|---|
| 421 | .map(|a| !a.is_hide_set()) | 
|---|
| 422 | .unwrap_or_default() | 
|---|
| 423 | }) | 
|---|
| 424 | .cloned() | 
|---|
| 425 | .chain(raw_req_args) | 
|---|
| 426 | .collect(); | 
|---|
| 427 |  | 
|---|
| 428 | Err(Error::missing_required_argument( | 
|---|
| 429 | self.cmd, | 
|---|
| 430 | req_args, | 
|---|
| 431 | usg.create_usage_with_title(&used), | 
|---|
| 432 | )) | 
|---|
| 433 | } | 
|---|
| 434 | } | 
|---|
| 435 |  | 
|---|
| 436 | #[ derive(Default, Clone, Debug)] | 
|---|
| 437 | struct Conflicts { | 
|---|
| 438 | potential: FlatMap<Id, Vec<Id>>, | 
|---|
| 439 | } | 
|---|
| 440 |  | 
|---|
| 441 | impl Conflicts { | 
|---|
| 442 | fn with_args(cmd: &Command, matcher: &ArgMatcher) -> Self { | 
|---|
| 443 | let mut potential = FlatMap::new(); | 
|---|
| 444 | potential.extend_unchecked( | 
|---|
| 445 | matcher | 
|---|
| 446 | .args() | 
|---|
| 447 | .filter(|(_, matched)| matched.check_explicit(&ArgPredicate::IsPresent)) | 
|---|
| 448 | .map(|(id, _)| { | 
|---|
| 449 | let conf = gather_direct_conflicts(cmd, id); | 
|---|
| 450 | (id.clone(), conf) | 
|---|
| 451 | }), | 
|---|
| 452 | ); | 
|---|
| 453 | Self { potential } | 
|---|
| 454 | } | 
|---|
| 455 |  | 
|---|
| 456 | fn gather_conflicts(&self, cmd: &Command, arg_id: &Id) -> Vec<Id> { | 
|---|
| 457 | debug!( "Conflicts::gather_conflicts: arg={arg_id:?}"); | 
|---|
| 458 | let mut conflicts = Vec::new(); | 
|---|
| 459 |  | 
|---|
| 460 | let arg_id_conflicts_storage; | 
|---|
| 461 | let arg_id_conflicts = if let Some(arg_id_conflicts) = self.get_direct_conflicts(arg_id) { | 
|---|
| 462 | arg_id_conflicts | 
|---|
| 463 | } else { | 
|---|
| 464 | // `is_missing_required_ok` is a case where we check not-present args for conflicts | 
|---|
| 465 | arg_id_conflicts_storage = gather_direct_conflicts(cmd, arg_id); | 
|---|
| 466 | &arg_id_conflicts_storage | 
|---|
| 467 | }; | 
|---|
| 468 | for (other_arg_id, other_arg_id_conflicts) in self.potential.iter() { | 
|---|
| 469 | if arg_id == other_arg_id { | 
|---|
| 470 | continue; | 
|---|
| 471 | } | 
|---|
| 472 |  | 
|---|
| 473 | if arg_id_conflicts.contains(other_arg_id) { | 
|---|
| 474 | conflicts.push(other_arg_id.clone()); | 
|---|
| 475 | } | 
|---|
| 476 | if other_arg_id_conflicts.contains(arg_id) { | 
|---|
| 477 | conflicts.push(other_arg_id.clone()); | 
|---|
| 478 | } | 
|---|
| 479 | } | 
|---|
| 480 |  | 
|---|
| 481 | debug!( "Conflicts::gather_conflicts: conflicts={conflicts:?}"); | 
|---|
| 482 | conflicts | 
|---|
| 483 | } | 
|---|
| 484 |  | 
|---|
| 485 | fn get_direct_conflicts(&self, arg_id: &Id) -> Option<&[Id]> { | 
|---|
| 486 | self.potential.get(arg_id).map(Vec::as_slice) | 
|---|
| 487 | } | 
|---|
| 488 | } | 
|---|
| 489 |  | 
|---|
| 490 | fn gather_direct_conflicts(cmd: &Command, id: &Id) -> Vec<Id> { | 
|---|
| 491 | let conf: Vec = if let Some(arg: &Arg) = cmd.find(id) { | 
|---|
| 492 | gather_arg_direct_conflicts(cmd, arg) | 
|---|
| 493 | } else if let Some(group: &ArgGroup) = cmd.find_group(id) { | 
|---|
| 494 | gather_group_direct_conflicts(group) | 
|---|
| 495 | } else { | 
|---|
| 496 | debug_assert!(false, "id={id:?}  is unknown"); | 
|---|
| 497 | Vec::new() | 
|---|
| 498 | }; | 
|---|
| 499 | debug!( "Conflicts::gather_direct_conflicts id={id:?}, conflicts={conf:?}",); | 
|---|
| 500 | conf | 
|---|
| 501 | } | 
|---|
| 502 |  | 
|---|
| 503 | fn gather_arg_direct_conflicts(cmd: &Command, arg: &Arg) -> Vec<Id> { | 
|---|
| 504 | let mut conf: Vec = arg.blacklist.clone(); | 
|---|
| 505 | for group_id: Id in cmd.groups_for_arg(arg.get_id()) { | 
|---|
| 506 | let group: &ArgGroup = cmd.find_group(&group_id).expect(INTERNAL_ERROR_MSG); | 
|---|
| 507 | conf.extend(iter:group.conflicts.iter().cloned()); | 
|---|
| 508 | if !group.multiple { | 
|---|
| 509 | for member_id: &Id in &group.args { | 
|---|
| 510 | if member_id != arg.get_id() { | 
|---|
| 511 | conf.push(member_id.clone()); | 
|---|
| 512 | } | 
|---|
| 513 | } | 
|---|
| 514 | } | 
|---|
| 515 | } | 
|---|
| 516 |  | 
|---|
| 517 | // Overrides are implicitly conflicts | 
|---|
| 518 | conf.extend(iter:arg.overrides.iter().cloned()); | 
|---|
| 519 |  | 
|---|
| 520 | conf | 
|---|
| 521 | } | 
|---|
| 522 |  | 
|---|
| 523 | fn gather_group_direct_conflicts(group: &ArgGroup) -> Vec<Id> { | 
|---|
| 524 | group.conflicts.clone() | 
|---|
| 525 | } | 
|---|
| 526 |  | 
|---|
| 527 | pub(crate) fn get_possible_values_cli(a: &Arg) -> Vec<PossibleValue> { | 
|---|
| 528 | if !a.is_takes_value_set() { | 
|---|
| 529 | vec![] | 
|---|
| 530 | } else { | 
|---|
| 531 | aOption>.get_value_parser() | 
|---|
| 532 | .possible_values() | 
|---|
| 533 | .map(|pvs: Box>| pvs.collect()) | 
|---|
| 534 | .unwrap_or_default() | 
|---|
| 535 | } | 
|---|
| 536 | } | 
|---|
| 537 |  | 
|---|